Page 301 - Pages from Main Additional Emails Updated
P. 301
did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about what was needed and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and about the
appeal.
This data should have been given under the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put in, so was wondering
what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I have already
th
sent 3 in so to do a 4 I do not feel I should need to do.
KGM have in fact not followed the protocol for the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been
put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason
you would have to stop the information I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no insurance.
And now say to deal with this you need information from me. I can understand you want the information for the complaint that has
been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact would
not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty.
I would like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regards to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I was
insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted going to court.
Regards
Simon Cordell
From: Austin, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Austin@canopius.com]
Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54
To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
Subject: RE: MT3574694
Dear Mr Cordell
Thank you for your email.
My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following documentary evidence from you
With regards to any losses that may have been incurred as a result of the above, I cX p 