Page :@0.778032:0.944662:0.815035:0.944662:0.815035:0.931348:0.778032:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253
50:@0.815234:0.944662:0.831931:0.944662:0.831931:0.931348:0.815234:0.931348:0.008191:0.008507
 of :@0.832255:0.944662:0.854767:0.944662:0.854767:0.931348:0.832255:0.931348:0.003781:0.008813:0.005665:0.004253
139:@0.854351:0.944662:0.879854:0.944662:0.879854:0.931348:0.854351:0.931348:0.008183:0.008813:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
In the first case the Chief Constable applied to the magistrates’ court for anti- social :@0.121066:0.102000:0.802527:0.102000:0.802527:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006802:0.006940:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
behaviour orders to be made against each of the defendants, three brothers aged 16, 15 and :@0.121066:0.118511:0.857816:0.118511:0.857816:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.006291:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006362:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
13, pursuant to section 1 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998'. The stipendiary magistrate :@0.121066:0.134546:0.847522:0.134546:0.847522:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.003750:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
made the orders, which, inter alia, prohibited the defendants from entering a particular area of :@0.121066:0.151022:0.881397:0.151022:0.881397:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006291:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
the city in which they lived. On the defendants’ appeal to the Crown Court, the judge held :@0.121066:0.167508:0.852405:0.167508:0.852405:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.009258:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.010082:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
chat the proceedings for the making of an order :@0.121066:0.184019:0.508874:0.184019:0.508874:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
were civil rather:@0.509469:0.184019:0.641399:0.184019:0.641399:0.168240:0.509469:0.168240:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006714
 than criminal and that, :@0.641826:0.184019:0.832564:0.184019:0.832564:0.168240:0.641826:0.168240:0.005091:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.004416:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041
therefore, they were not subject to the rules of evidence which applied in criminal :@0.121066:0.200506:0.784491:0.200506:0.784491:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
prosecutions or to the protection of article 6(2) of the Convention for the Protection of :@0.121066:0.216542:0.821380:0.216542:0.821380:0.200763:0.121066:0.200763:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.006019:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.004416:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008186:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as scheduled to the Human Rights Act 1.998c :@0.121066:0.233017:0.849519:0.233017:0.849519:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.014498:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.011332:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
However, the court applied the standard of proof of being “satisfied so that it was sure” that :@0.121066:0.249527:0.863895:0.249527:0.863895:0.233748:0.121066:0.233748:0.014498:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
the orders should be made and, having done so, dismissed the appeals.  :@0.121066:0.266002:0.699225:0.266002:0.699225:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005226:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.015728:0.005646:0.008166:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.006274:0.005041
The defendants brought judicial review proceedings seeking an order of certiorari to quash :@0.121066:0.282489:0.856354:0.282489:0.856354:0.266710:0.121066:0.266710:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041
the judge’s decision.  :@0.121066:0.298525:0.297582:0.298525:0.297582:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005911:0.005041
The Divisional Court dismissed the application and the Court of Appeal upheld that decision. :@0.121066:0.315035:0.878934:0.315035:0.878934:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.015728:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010687:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.006893:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
The defendants appealed. :@0.121066:0.331510:0.331659:0.331510:0.331659:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005972:0.005041
In the second case the local authority applied to the magistrates’ court for an antisocial :@0.121066:0.347997:0.824573:0.347997:0.824573:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006792:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
behaviour order to be made against the defendant. The application was based primarily on :@0.121066:0.364472:0.852563:0.364472:0.852563:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.007541:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
hearsay evidence including evidence from anonymous complainants and evidence from :@0.121066:0.380544:0.832379:0.380544:0.832379:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010687:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041
complainants whose identities were not disclosed. A hearsay notice under the Magistrates’ :@0.121066:0.397019:0.854983:0.397019:0.854983:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010687:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.008166:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041
Courts (Hearsay Evidence in Civil Proceedings) Rules 1999 was served on the defendant, :@0.121066:0.413505:0.848228:0.413505:0.848228:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.011332:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041
who challenged its validity. Following a pre-trial review, the district judge stated a case for :@0.121066:0.429992:0.859906:0.429992:0.859906:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.007471:0.008822:0.006940:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
the Divisional Court raising questions about the admissibility of hearsay evidence in the :@0.121066:0.446503:0.834799:0.446503:0.834799:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
proceedings. The Divisional Court, in reliance on the decision of the Divisional Court in the :@0.121066:0.462539:0.867646:0.462539:0.867646:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006291:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
first case, ruled that the proceedings were civil and that the hearsay evidence could be :@0.121066:0.479014:0.818124:0.479014:0.818124:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.006916:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005908:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010687:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
admitted. The defendant appealed pursuant to a certificate granted under section 1 of the :@0.121066:0.495489:0.838610:0.495489:0.838610:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010687:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
Administration of Justice Act 1960. :@0.121066:0.512011:0.414867:0.512011:0.414867:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.014498:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008166:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005521:0.005041
On the appeals— :@0.121066:0.528486:0.274898:0.528486:0.274898:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.015728:0.011332:0.005041:0.006916:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007780:0.019525:0.005041
Held, dismissing the appeal in the first case and declaring that the house had no jurisdiction :@0.121066:0.544522:0.863747:0.544522:0.863747:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.015728:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008180:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010687:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
to hear the appeal in the second case, that since applications for antisocial behaviour orders :@0.121066:0.561009:0.861610:0.561009:0.861610:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.009437:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006627:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041
under section 1 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1 998 were initiated by the civil process of :@0.121066:0.577484:0.847543:0.577484:0.847543:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
complaint and did not charge the defendant with any :@0.121066:0.593994:0.550434:0.593994:0.550434:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005290:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010482:0.005041
Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s r: see post, para 6. :@0.121066:0.610469:0.535312:0.610469:0.535312:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005629:0.005041
Human Rights Act 1998, Sell 1, Pt., art 6: see post, para 7. :@0.121066:0.626505:0.597718:0.626505:0.597718:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.014498:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006335:0.005041
97, :@0.121066:0.642992:0.151311:0.642992:0.151311:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.659503:0.501874:0.659503:0.501874:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006872:0.005041
50 :@0.121066:0.675978:0.146271:0.675978:0.146271:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E) :@0.121066:0.692013:0.515148:0.692013:0.515148:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.016144:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.007007:0.005041
(2003] 1 AC :@0.121066:0.708500:0.228236:0.708500:0.228236:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006358:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.013866:0.005041
crime or involve the Crown Prosecution Service, and since the making of such an order, the :@0.121066:0.725011:0.865186:0.725011:0.865186:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.010082:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
purpose of which was preventive not punitive, was not a conviction, did not appear on the :@0.121066:0.741486:0.850164:0.741486:0.850164:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
defendant’s criminal record and resulted in no penalty, the proceedings were civil under :@0.121066:0.757973:0.835703:0.757973:0.835703:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010865:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006291:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
domestic law; that, since the proceedings did not involve the determination of a criminal :@0.121066:0.774008:0.838550:0.774008:0.838550:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
charge and could not result in the imposition of an immediate penalty on the defendant, they :@0.121066:0.790519:0.870126:0.790519:0.870126:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
therefore could not be classified as criminal for the purposes of article 6 of the Convention; :@0.121066:0.806994:0.861879:0.806994:0.861879:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.006251:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
that, in so far as the proceedings involved a determination of the defendants’ civil rights and :@0.121066:0.823481:0.868876:0.823481:0.868876:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006291:0.008812:0.006916:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
thereby engaged the right to a fair trial under article 6(r),  :@0.121066:0.839956:0.588913:0.839956:0.588913:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.005273:0.005041
the use of hearsay evidence admissible under the Civil Evidence Act 1995 in such :@0.121066:0.856027:0.787025:0.856027:0.787025:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.008166:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007494:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
proceedings was not unfair and involved no violation of that right; that hearsay evidence :@0.121066:0.872502:0.838711:0.872502:0.838711:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041
under the 1995 Act and the 1999 Rules was therefore admissible on an application for an :@0.121066:0.888989:0.843187:0.888989:0.843187:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.015103:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.006291:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
anti-social behaviour order under section 1 of the 1998 Act; but that, given the seriousness of :@0.121066:0.905470:0.877042:0.905470:0.877042:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005706:0.006931:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010551:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008166:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041