Page :@0.778032:0.944662:0.815035:0.944662:0.815035:0.931348:0.778032:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253
51:@0.815234:0.944662:0.831931:0.944662:0.831931:0.931348:0.815234:0.931348:0.008191:0.008507
 of :@0.832255:0.944662:0.854767:0.944662:0.854767:0.931348:0.832255:0.931348:0.003781:0.008813:0.005665:0.004253
139:@0.854351:0.944662:0.879854:0.944662:0.879854:0.931348:0.854351:0.931348:0.008183:0.008813:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
the matter involved, the court should be satisfied to the criminal standard of proof that a :@0.121066:0.102000:0.834174:0.102000:0.834174:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
defendant had acted in an anti-social manner before making such an order; and that, :@0.121066:0.118511:0.801922:0.118511:0.801922:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006012:0.006923:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041
accordingly, in rile first case the appropriate standard of proof had been applied, and since the :@0.121066:0.134546:0.882510:0.134546:0.882510:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.006916:0.007948:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
second case was not a “criminal cause or matter” the House had no jurisdiction to hear the :@0.121066:0.151022:0.853128:0.151022:0.853128:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
appeal under section 1 of the 1960 Act (post, paras 22, 2627, 30, 33-35, 36, 37, 39-40, 5H 55-:@0.121066:0.167508:0.878709:0.167508:0.878709:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010683:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010132:0.006923:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010183:0.006940:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.014498:0.005078:0.010082:0.010082:0.006714
5h, 64, 67, 68, 74, 76-77, 81-84, 94-98, 102103, 105-106, 108, 111, 112, 11 3-117). :@0.121066:0.184019:0.802010:0.184019:0.802010:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010166:0.006940:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010115:0.006940:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010115:0.006923:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010132:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.009494:0.006940:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010199:0.006940:0.009457:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005085:0.005041
(22):@0.121066:0.200506:0.154860:0.200506:0.154860:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006714
 :@0.154462:0.200420:0.160068:0.200420:0.160068:0.184527:0.154462:0.184527:0.005605
Dicta of Lord Atkin in :@0.160133:0.200506:0.346486:0.200506:0.346486:0.184727:0.160133:0.184727:0.014498:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
Proprietary Articles Trade Association v Attorney General for :@0.346781:0.200506:0.862911:0.200506:0.862911:0.184727:0.346781:0.184727:0.012582:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.013852:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.012582:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.013227:0.008166:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.015103:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041
Canada:@0.151311:0.216542:0.216198:0.216542:0.216198:0.200763:0.151311:0.200763:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082
 [1.931] AC 310, 324,  :@0.216255:0.216542:0.404147:0.216542:0.404147:0.200763:0.216255:0.200763:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005794:0.005041
(23):@0.121066:0.233017:0.154860:0.233017:0.154860:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006714
 :@0.154462:0.232931:0.160068:0.232931:0.160068:0.217038:0.154462:0.217038:0.005605
PC, of Lord Bingham of Cornhili CJ in Customs and Excise Comrs v City of London :@0.160133:0.233017:0.870902:0.233017:0.870902:0.217238:0.160133:0.217238:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.011332:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.015728:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.015728:0.008166:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.012582:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041
Magistrates' Court :@0.151311:0.249527:0.311834:0.249527:0.311834:0.233748:0.151311:0.233748:0.017643:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041
[2000] 1 WLR 2020, 2025,  :@0.312117:0.249527:0.542234:0.249527:0.542234:0.233748:0.312117:0.233748:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.019518:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005817:0.005041
(24):@0.121066:0.266002:0.154860:0.266002:0.154860:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006714
 :@0.154462:0.265917:0.160068:0.265917:0.160068:0.250024:0.154462:0.250024:0.005605
DC, B 1 > Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary:@0.160133:0.266002:0.686687:0.266002:0.686687:0.250223:0.160133:0.250223:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.011352:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013852:0.008812:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011957:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008953
 [2001] 1 WLR 340, :@0.687245:0.266002:0.856700:0.266002:0.856700:0.250223:0.687245:0.250223:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.019518:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
DC, S v Miller 2001 SC 977 and  :@0.151311:0.282489:0.425571:0.282489:0.425571:0.266710:0.151311:0.266710:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005337:0.005041
(25):@0.121066:0.298525:0.154860:0.298525:0.154860:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006714
 :@0.154462:0.298439:0.160068:0.298439:0.160068:0.282546:0.154462:0.282546:0.005605
Gough v Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary:@0.160133:0.298525:0.604782:0.298525:0.604782:0.282746:0.160133:0.282746:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.011332:0.005646:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008953
 [2002] QB 1213, CA applied. :@0.605296:0.298525:0.856233:0.298525:0.856233:0.282746:0.605296:0.282746:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010687:0.006291:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.013832:0.014498:0.005041:0.009437:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005343:0.005041
Decision of the Court of Appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 281; [2001] 1. WLR 1084; [2001] 4 All :@0.121066:0.315035:0.867323:0.315035:0.867323:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.012582:0.018893:0.013227:0.014498:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.019518:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
ER 264 affirmed. :@0.121066:0.331510:0.266715:0.331510:0.266715:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.005646:0.006916:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.004644:0.005041
The following cases are referred to in the opinions of their Lordships. :@0.121066:0.347997:0.687245:0.347997:0.687245:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.009127:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005595:0.005041
Adolf v Austria:@0.121066:0.364472:0.246968:0.364472:0.246968:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082
 (1982) 4 EHRR 313 :@0.247173:0.364472:0.420547:0.364472:0.420547:0.348693:0.247173:0.348693:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010230:0.005041
Albert and Le Compte v Belgium :@0.121066:0.380544:0.398034:0.380544:0.398034:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.011332:0.015728:0.005041
(1983)5 EHRR 533 :@0.398484:0.380544:0.561776:0.380544:0.561776:0.364765:0.398484:0.364765:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010230:0.005041
^ :@0.605296:0.380544:0.619781:0.380544:0.619781:0.364765:0.605296:0.364765:0.009443:0.005041
Amand v Home Secretary:@0.121066:0.397019:0.333974:0.397019:0.333974:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.013227:0.015728:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008166:0.008953
 1943 | AC 147; [1942] 2 All ER 381, HL(E) :@0.334179:0.397019:0.701746:0.397019:0.701746:0.381240:0.334179:0.381240:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.003771:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010687:0.006291:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.011977:0.006916:0.012582:0.007323:0.005041
B v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary:@0.121066:0.413505:0.591504:0.413505:0.591504:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.008166:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008953
 [200 t] I WLR 340; [2001] 1 All :@0.592056:0.413505:0.864127:0.413505:0.864127:0.397727:0.592056:0.397727:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010089:0.005058:0.006291:0.006291:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.018893:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
ER 562, DC :@0.121066:0.429992:0.225077:0.429992:0.225077:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.013295:0.005041
B endenoun v France:@0.121066:0.446503:0.301309:0.446503:0.301309:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.011332:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.008953
 (19 9 4) 18 EHRR 5 4  :@0.301363:0.446503:0.495556:0.446503:0.495556:0.430724:0.301363:0.430724:0.005091:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005794:0.005041
Bcnham v United Kingdom:@0.121066:0.462539:0.347665:0.462539:0.347665:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.013227:0.008812:0.011332:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015687
 (1996) 22 EHRR 293 :@0.348042:0.462539:0.531531:0.462539:0.531531:0.446760:0.348042:0.446760:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010263:0.005041
Brown v Stott :@0.121066:0.479014:0.238781:0.479014:0.238781:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.013227:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
(2003] t AC 68 r; [1001] 2 WLR 817; [2001] 2 All ER 97,  :@0.238990:0.479014:0.720044:0.479014:0.720044:0.463235:0.238990:0.463235:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.019518:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006140:0.005041
PC Cons tanda v M :@0.121066:0.495489:0.287961:0.495489:0.287961:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.017643:0.005041
19 9 7 S C 217 :@0.288139:0.495489:0.414229:0.495489:0.414229:0.479710:0.288139:0.479710:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010794:0.005041
Customs and Excise Comrs v City of London Magistrates’ :@0.121066:0.512011:0.607461:0.512011:0.607461:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.013227:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.015728:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.015728:0.008166:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013617:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.017643:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041
Court [2000] 1 WLR Z020; :@0.607800:0.512011:0.835770:0.512011:0.835770:0.496232:0.607800:0.496232:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
120001 4 All ER 763,  :@0.121066:0.528486:0.308924:0.528486:0.308924:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005196:0.005041
DC Deweer u Belgium :@0.121066:0.544522:0.313105:0.544522:0.313105:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.013227:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.011332:0.015728:0.005041
(1980) 2 EHRR 439  :@0.313377:0.544522:0.486734:0.544522:0.486734:0.528743:0.313377:0.528743:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005172:0.005041
Dumbo Beheer BV v The Netherlands:@0.121066:0.561009:0.436809:0.561009:0.436809:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.014498:0.011332:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.013852:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.007844
 (1993) 18 EHRR 213  :@0.436913:0.561009:0.626082:0.561009:0.626082:0.545230:0.436913:0.545230:0.005091:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005810:0.005041
Doorson v The Netherlands :@0.121066:0.577484:0.355327:0.577484:0.355327:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041
(1996)22 EHRR 3 30 Engel t/  :@0.355603:0.577484:0.607817:0.577484:0.607817:0.561705:0.355603:0.561705:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005370:0.005041
The Netherlands:@0.121066:0.593994:0.260478:0.593994:0.260478:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.012582:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.007844
 (No 1) (1976) > EHRR 647  :@0.260414:0.593994:0.498093:0.593994:0.498093:0.578215:0.260414:0.578215:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.011372:0.005041:0.012562:0.014642:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.004463:0.005041
Garyfallou AEBE v Greece :@0.121066:0.610469:0.352142:0.610469:0.352142:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.014498:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.013227:0.013227:0.013227:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.007561:0.008812:0.009437:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041
(1997) 28 EHRR 344 :@0.352444:0.610469:0.530892:0.610469:0.530892:0.594690:0.352444:0.594690:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010263:0.005041
Gough v Chief Constable of the Derbyshire Constabulary :@0.121066:0.626505:0.601445:0.626505:0.601445:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.011332:0.005646:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041
[2001 j EWITC Admin 554; :@0.602137:0.626505:0.836358:0.626505:0.836358:0.610726:0.602137:0.610726:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.018893:0.006916:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
[2002] QB 459; [2001] 3 WLR T392; [2001] 4 All ER 289, DC; [2002] EWCA Civ 351; :@0.121066:0.642992:0.842865:0.642992:0.842865:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.019518:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.012582:0.018893:0.013227:0.015103:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
12002] QB tzr 3; (2002] 3 WLR 289; [2002] 2 All ER 985,  :@0.121066:0.659503:0.609060:0.659503:0.609060:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.019518:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005367:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005817:0.005041
CA Guzzardi v Italy:@0.121066:0.675978:0.284271:0.675978:0.284271:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.014498:0.011332:0.007561:0.007561:0.010687:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008953
 (1980) 3 EHRR 3 3 3 :@0.284358:0.675978:0.468469:0.675978:0.468469:0.660199:0.284358:0.660199:0.005024:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010902:0.005041
H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof), hi re:@0.121066:0.692013:0.558154:0.692013:0.558154:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.015728:0.005041:0.006916:0.017643:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.011332:0.008812:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.010707:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008953
 [ 1996] AC 563; (1996] 2 WLR 8; [ :@0.558617:0.692013:0.857181:0.692013:0.857181:0.676234:0.558617:0.676234:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041
1996] 1 All ER 1, HI. (E) :@0.121066:0.708500:0.332280:0.708500:0.332280:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.012582:0.006533:0.005041
Han v Customs and Excise Comrs :@0.121066:0.725011:0.409406:0.725011:0.409406:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.015728:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.015728:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.015728:0.008166:0.007561:0.005041
{200:] EWCA Civ 1040; [2001] 1 WLR 2253; [2001] 4 :@0.409826:0.725011:0.865223:0.725011:0.865223:0.709232:0.409826:0.709232:0.009457:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006291:0.006291:0.005041:0.012582:0.018893:0.013227:0.014498:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.019518:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010687:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041
All ER 687, CA :@0.121066:0.741486:0.255994:0.741486:0.255994:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010186:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.014548:0.005041
Kostovskt v The Netherlands:@0.121066:0.757973:0.358695:0.757973:0.358695:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.011332:0.009437:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.007844
 (5989) 12 EHRR 434  :@0.358745:0.757973:0.547275:0.757973:0.547275:0.742194:0.358745:0.742194:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005222:0.005041
Lauko v Slovakia :@0.121066:0.774008:0.270922:0.774008:0.270922:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.012582:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
(1998) 33 EHRR 994 :@0.271117:0.774008:0.448927:0.774008:0.448927:0.758229:0.271117:0.758229:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.004416:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010250:0.005041
98, :@0.121066:0.790519:0.151311:0.790519:0.151311:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.806994:0.501874:0.806994:0.501874:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006872:0.005041
[2003] I AC :@0.121066:0.823481:0.224455:0.823481:0.224455:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.013298:0.005041
51 :@0.121066:0.839956:0.146271:0.839956:0.146271:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E) :@0.121066:0.856027:0.515148:0.856027:0.515148:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.007424:0.005041
Lutz v Germany:@0.121066:0.872502:0.254045:0.872502:0.254045:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.012582:0.011332:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.015728:0.010082:0.011332:0.008953
 (1987) Ro EHRR 181 :@0.254113:0.872502:0.457127:0.872502:0.457127:0.856723:0.254113:0.856723:0.005663:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.007541:0.006291:0.013852:0.011332:0.005646:0.013207:0.015728:0.013852:0.014478:0.005646:0.010687:0.011332:0.011786:0.005041
M v Italy:@0.121066:0.888989:0.195490:0.888989:0.195490:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.017643:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008953
 (1991) 70 DR 59 :@0.195470:0.888989:0.356863:0.888989:0.356863:0.873210:0.195470:0.873210:0.005663:0.008166:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.007541:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.015728:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.011722:0.005041
McFeeley v United Kingdom:@0.121066:0.905470:0.358352:0.905470:0.358352:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.009437:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015687
 (1980) 3 EHRR 161 :@0.358745:0.905470:0.547275:0.905470:0.547275:0.889691:0.358745:0.889691:0.005679:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.008166:0.005646:0.010687:0.005646:0.013852:0.015103:0.014478:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011782:0.005041