﻿Page :@0.778032:0.944662:0.815035:0.944662:0.815035:0.931348:0.778032:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253
52:@0.815234:0.944662:0.831931:0.944662:0.831931:0.931348:0.815234:0.931348:0.008191:0.008507
 of :@0.832255:0.944662:0.854767:0.944662:0.854767:0.931348:0.832255:0.931348:0.003781:0.008813:0.005665:0.004253
139:@0.854351:0.944662:0.879854:0.944662:0.879854:0.931348:0.854351:0.931348:0.008183:0.008813:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
M'Gregor v D:@0.121066:0.102000:0.237007:0.102000:0.237007:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.017643:0.005646:0.014498:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014558
 1977 SC 3 30 :@0.237057:0.102000:0.368827:0.102000:0.368827:0.086221:0.237057:0.086221:0.005713:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.005646:0.012582:0.013852:0.005646:0.011332:0.005646:0.010687:0.011587:0.005041
Official Receiver v Stern \2.000] 1:@0.121066:0.118511:0.402846:0.118511:0.402846:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.014498:0.006916:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.011332:0.005424:0.005679:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082
 WLR 22.30; [2001] 1 All ER633, CA :@0.402887:0.118511:0.745679:0.118511:0.745679:0.102732:0.402887:0.102732:0.006301:0.020143:0.012582:0.014478:0.005646:0.010687:0.011332:0.005646:0.010687:0.010687:0.006916:0.005646:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.010687:0.005646:0.015728:0.006291:0.006291:0.005646:0.013852:0.013852:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.006291:0.014478:0.015103:0.005041
Qztiirk v :@0.747148:0.118511:0.823286:0.118511:0.823286:0.102732:0.747148:0.102732:0.015103:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
Germany:@0.121066:0.134546:0.198031:0.134546:0.198031:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.015728:0.010082:0.011332:0.008953
 (1984) 6 EHRR 409 :@0.197974:0.134546:0.386521:0.134546:0.386521:0.118768:0.197974:0.118768:0.005679:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.008166:0.005646:0.010687:0.005646:0.013852:0.015103:0.014478:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011799:0.005041
^ :@0.423689:0.134546:0.438812:0.134546:0.438812:0.118768:0.423689:0.118768:0.010082:0.005041
Percy v Director of Public Prosecutions:@0.121066:0.151022:0.449734:0.151022:0.449734:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.012582:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.007561:0.010082:0.007561:0.009255:0.008812:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.007844
 [r995l 1 WLR 1381; l.t.995] 3 All ER 124, DC :@0.449566:0.151022:0.877035:0.151022:0.877035:0.135243:0.449566:0.135243:0.005663:0.007541:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.006291:0.010687:0.006291:0.019518:0.013207:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.006291:0.006291:0.006291:0.005646:0.006291:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.007541:0.005646:0.010687:0.006291:0.015103:0.006291:0.006916:0.006291:0.013207:0.013852:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.005646:0.015728:0.015509:0.005041
Proprietary Articles Trade Association v Attorney General for Canada:@0.121066:0.167508:0.702082:0.167508:0.702082:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.012582:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.013852:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.012582:0.007561:0.010082:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.008166:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.015103:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082
 [1931] AC 310, :@0.703628:0.167508:0.852711:0.167508:0.852711:0.151729:0.703628:0.151729:0.005679:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.015103:0.014478:0.005646:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.005041
PC :@0.121066:0.184019:0.152572:0.184019:0.152572:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.011972:0.014493:0.005041
R v Kansa! (No z):@0.121066:0.200506:0.269491:0.200506:0.269491:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.010687:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.006714
 [2001] UKHL 62; [2002] 2 AC 69; [2001] 3 WLR 1.562; [2002] :@0.269857:0.200506:0.851780:0.200506:0.851780:0.184727:0.269857:0.184727:0.005679:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.015103:0.015728:0.015728:0.012582:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.006291:0.005646:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.007541:0.005646:0.010687:0.006291:0.015103:0.014478:0.005646:0.010687:0.011332:0.006291:0.005646:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.007541:0.005646:0.010687:0.006291:0.020143:0.012582:0.014478:0.005646:0.010687:0.006291:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.006291:0.005646:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.008959:0.005041
All ER 257, HL{E) :@0.121066:0.216542:0.301984:0.216542:0.301984:0.200763:0.121066:0.200763:0.015103:0.006291:0.006291:0.006291:0.013852:0.015728:0.005646:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.006291:0.016373:0.013852:0.009437:0.013852:0.008519:0.005041
R v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, Ex p McCormick:@0.121066:0.233017:0.647433:0.233017:0.647433:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.005056:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010687:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.012582:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.013227:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.009437:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.015728:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082
 :@0.648178:0.233017:0.653219:0.233017:0.653219:0.217238:0.648178:0.217238:0.005041
[1998] BCC 379 :@0.653857:0.233017:0.805468:0.233017:0.805468:0.217238:0.653857:0.217238:0.008166:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.013852:0.014478:0.014478:0.005646:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.005041
Raimondo v Italy:@0.121066:0.249527:0.264107:0.249527:0.264107:0.233748:0.121066:0.233748:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008953
 :@0.264194:0.249527:0.269235:0.249527:0.269235:0.233748:0.264194:0.233748:0.005041
(1994) 18 EJHRR 137 :@0.269857:0.249527:0.471756:0.249527:0.471756:0.233748:0.269857:0.233748:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.007541:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.005646:0.013207:0.009437:0.015103:0.014478:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.005041
Ravnsborg v Sweden:@0.472871:0.249527:0.644666:0.249527:0.644666:0.233748:0.472871:0.233748:0.013227:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.007561:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.011211
 :@0.645657:0.249527:0.650698:0.249527:0.650698:0.233748:0.645657:0.233748:0.005041
(1994) r 8 EHRR 3 8 :@0.651337:0.249527:0.842337:0.249527:0.842337:0.233748:0.651337:0.233748:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.007541:0.005646:0.008166:0.005646:0.010687:0.005646:0.013852:0.015103:0.014478:0.013852:0.005646:0.011332:0.005646:0.011786:0.005041
S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan), In re:@0.121066:0.266002:0.629876:0.266002:0.629876:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.011332:0.005041:0.006916:0.017643:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.007561:0.010687:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.011332:0.005041:0.007561:0.008953
 :@0.630484:0.266002:0.635525:0.266002:0.635525:0.250223:0.630484:0.250223:0.005041
[2001] UKHL 10. :@0.636164:0.266002:0.799489:0.266002:0.799489:0.250223:0.636164:0.250223:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.007541:0.005646:0.015728:0.015103:0.015728:0.013207:0.005646:0.010687:0.010687:0.006735:0.005041
12002] 2 AC 291; [2002] zWLR 720; [2002] 2 All ER 5:92, HL(E) :@0.121066:0.282489:0.721305:0.282489:0.721305:0.266710:0.121066:0.266710:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005646:0.011332:0.005646:0.015728:0.013852:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.006916:0.005646:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.009437:0.020143:0.013207:0.013852:0.005646:0.011332:0.011426:0.010687:0.006916:0.005646:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.010687:0.005646:0.015728:0.006291:0.006291:0.005646:0.013852:0.013852:0.005646:0.011332:0.006291:0.010687:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.015728:0.012582:0.007541:0.013207:0.008946:0.005041
S v Miller:@0.121066:0.298525:0.202527:0.298525:0.202527:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.017643:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007844
 :@0.202393:0.298525:0.207434:0.298525:0.207434:0.282746:0.202393:0.282746:0.005041
200 s SC 977 :@0.208055:0.298525:0.332280:0.298525:0.332280:0.282746:0.208055:0.282746:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.008812:0.005646:0.011957:0.014478:0.005646:0.010687:0.011332:0.011631:0.005041
Saidi v France:@0.121066:0.315035:0.242713:0.315035:0.242713:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.008953
 :@0.242770:0.315035:0.247811:0.315035:0.247811:0.299256:0.242770:0.299256:0.005041
{1993} 17 EHRR 251 :@0.249072:0.315035:0.448305:0.315035:0.448305:0.299256:0.249072:0.299256:0.010062:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.010062:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.013207:0.015728:0.014478:0.013852:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.011792:0.005041
Sporrong and Ldnnrotb v Sweden:@0.121066:0.331510:0.401825:0.331510:0.401825:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.011211
 :@0.402265:0.331510:0.407306:0.331510:0.407306:0.315731:0.402265:0.315731:0.005041
(1981) j EHRR 35 :@0.407944:0.331510:0.575000:0.331510:0.575000:0.315731:0.407944:0.315731:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.007541:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.013207:0.015728:0.013852:0.014478:0.005646:0.010687:0.011735:0.005041
Steel v United Kingdom:@0.121066:0.347997:0.317400:0.347997:0.317400:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015687
 :@0.317796:0.347997:0.322837:0.347997:0.322837:0.332218:0.317796:0.332218:0.005041
(1998) 28 EHRR 603 :@0.323459:0.347997:0.517030:0.347997:0.517030:0.332218:0.323459:0.332218:0.007541:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.007541:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.013207:0.015728:0.014478:0.013852:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.011816:0.005041
Unterpertinger v Austria:@0.121066:0.364472:0.325001:0.364472:0.325001:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.014498:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.013227:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082
 (1986) 13 EHRR 175 :@0.325979:0.364472:0.525213:0.364472:0.525213:0.348693:0.325979:0.348693:0.005679:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.007541:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.005646:0.013852:0.015103:0.014478:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011779:0.005041
Woodball (Alice), Ex p:@0.121066:0.380544:0.309939:0.380544:0.309939:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.017643:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082
 (:@0.310235:0.380544:0.322612:0.380544:0.322612:0.364765:0.310235:0.364765:0.005663:0.006714
1888) 20 QBD 83 2, CA :@0.323459:0.380544:0.544755:0.380544:0.544755:0.364765:0.323459:0.364765:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.007541:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.006510:0.015103:0.014478:0.015103:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.011332:0.005646:0.006291:0.013852:0.016033:0.005041
The following additional cases were cited in argumen  :@0.121066:0.397019:0.617899:0.397019:0.617899:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.013207:0.010687:0.009437:0.005646:0.007541:0.011332:0.006291:0.006291:0.011332:0.015103:0.006291:0.010687:0.011332:0.005646:0.010062:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.006916:0.006291:0.010687:0.011332:0.009437:0.006291:0.006291:0.009437:0.010062:0.008812:0.010062:0.008166:0.005646:0.015728:0.009437:0.007541:0.010062:0.005646:0.009437:0.006916:0.006291:0.010062:0.010687:0.005646:0.006291:0.011332:0.005646:0.009437:0.008166:0.010687:0.010687:0.016998:0.009437:0.010082:0.017603:0.005041
t::@0.597096:0.397019:0.611372:0.397019:0.611372:0.381240:0.597096:0.381240:0.007561:0.006714
Bonalmm v Secretary of State for the Home Department:@0.121066:0.413505:0.586826:0.413505:0.586826:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.015728:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.011332:0.005605
 [1985] QB 675; [1985] :@0.587653:0.413505:0.803270:0.413505:0.803270:0.397727:0.587653:0.397727:0.005663:0.008166:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.006291:0.005646:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.008055:0.005041
WLR 712; 11.985] 1. AUER797, CA :@0.121066:0.429992:0.453346:0.429992:0.453346:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.019518:0.013207:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.006291:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.010687:0.005646:0.006291:0.015103:0.015103:0.013852:0.013852:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.006291:0.013852:0.016477:0.005041
^ :@0.484214:0.429992:0.499336:0.429992:0.499336:0.414213:0.484214:0.414213:0.010082:0.005041
Botross v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council:@0.121066:0.446503:0.651713:0.446503:0.651713:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.008166:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.015728:0.015728:0.008812:0.008166:0.007561:0.015728:0.005646:0.005646:0.011332:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005605
 :@0.652597:0.446503:0.657638:0.446503:0.657638:0.430724:0.652597:0.430724:0.005041
(1994} 93 LGR 268, :@0.658260:0.446503:0.845496:0.446503:0.845496:0.430724:0.658260:0.430724:0.007541:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.010062:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.013207:0.015103:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.006731:0.005041
DC :@0.121066:0.462539:0.155722:0.462539:0.155722:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.015123:0.014493:0.005041
, :@0.181591:0.462539:0.192311:0.462539:0.192311:0.446760:0.181591:0.446760:0.005679:0.005041
. :@0.242132:0.462539:0.252836:0.462539:0.252836:0.446760:0.242132:0.446760:0.005663:0.005041
Carr v Atkins:@0.121066:0.479014:0.232773:0.479014:0.232773:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.011332:0.007844
 :@0.232638:0.479014:0.237679:0.479014:0.237679:0.463235:0.232638:0.463235:0.005041
[1987] QB 963; [1987] 3 WLR 529; [1987] 3 All LR 684, CA :@0.238351:0.479014:0.790594:0.479014:0.790594:0.463235:0.238351:0.463235:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.007541:0.005646:0.015728:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.006916:0.005646:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.010687:0.006291:0.019518:0.013207:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.006291:0.005646:0.007541:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.007541:0.005646:0.010687:0.006291:0.015103:0.006291:0.006291:0.006291:0.013207:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.005646:0.006291:0.013852:0.015103:0.005041
Ihhotson :@0.793188:0.479014:0.873157:0.479014:0.873157:0.463235:0.793188:0.463235:0.007561:0.011332:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041
v United Kingdom:@0.121066:0.495489:0.272112:0.495489:0.272112:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015687
 (1998) 27 EHRR CD 332 :@0.272377:0.495489:0.506898:0.495489:0.506898:0.479710:0.272377:0.479710:0.005663:0.007541:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.007541:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.013207:0.015728:0.014478:0.013852:0.006291:0.013852:0.015103:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011856:0.005041
Krone-Verilog GmbH v Austria:@0.121066:0.512011:0.381755:0.512011:0.381755:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.008879:0.006923:0.013227:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.015728:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.013227:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082
 (Application No 28977/95) (unreported) 21 May 1997, :@0.382101:0.512011:0.878245:0.512011:0.878245:0.496232:0.382101:0.496232:0.005663:0.008166:0.015103:0.010687:0.011332:0.006291:0.006291:0.010062:0.009437:0.006291:0.006916:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.015103:0.011332:0.005646:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.006916:0.010687:0.010687:0.007541:0.005646:0.008166:0.010687:0.010687:0.008166:0.009437:0.010687:0.010687:0.007541:0.006916:0.009437:0.010687:0.008166:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.018893:0.009437:0.011332:0.005646:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.005041
E Com HR :@0.121066:0.528486:0.222556:0.528486:0.222556:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.013207:0.005646:0.013852:0.010687:0.016998:0.005646:0.015728:0.014686:0.005041
Nottingham City Council v Zain (A Manor):@0.121066:0.544522:0.483323:0.544522:0.483323:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.011332:0.005041:0.006916:0.013227:0.005562:0.017643:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.006714
 I2001j EWCA Civ 1248; [2002] 1 WLR :@0.483592:0.544522:0.847196:0.544522:0.847196:0.528743:0.483592:0.528743:0.005679:0.007541:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.005646:0.013852:0.019518:0.014478:0.015103:0.006291:0.013852:0.006291:0.011332:0.005646:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.006916:0.005646:0.007541:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.010687:0.006291:0.019518:0.013207:0.013852:0.005041
607, CA :@0.121066:0.561009:0.200511:0.561009:0.200511:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.005646:0.014478:0.015929:0.005041
Pelle v France:@0.121066:0.577484:0.241423:0.577484:0.241423:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.012582:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.008953
 (1986) 50 DR 263 :@0.241510:0.577484:0.413607:0.577484:0.413607:0.561705:0.241510:0.561705:0.005663:0.008166:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.007541:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.005646:0.015728:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011739:0.005041
R v Board of Visitors of Hull Prison, Ex p St Germain:@0.121066:0.593994:0.569224:0.593994:0.569224:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.006291:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.015728:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.011211
 [1.979] QB 42S; 119791 1 WLR :@0.569960:0.593994:0.868133:0.593994:0.868133:0.578215:0.569960:0.578215:0.005679:0.007541:0.011332:0.005646:0.010687:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.006291:0.015103:0.014478:0.005646:0.010687:0.010687:0.012582:0.006291:0.005646:0.011332:0.010687:0.011332:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.010687:0.006291:0.019518:0.013207:0.013852:0.005041
42; [1979] 1 AUER 701, CA :@0.121066:0.610469:0.380203:0.610469:0.380203:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.010687:0.010687:0.006291:0.005646:0.008166:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005646:0.010687:0.006291:0.015103:0.015103:0.013852:0.013852:0.006291:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.005646:0.006291:0.013852:0.016346:0.005041
R (McCann) v Crown Court at Manchester :@0.121066:0.626505:0.482479:0.626505:0.482479:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.013227:0.005041:0.006916:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.007561:0.010687:0.013227:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.017643:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.009437:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041
APPEAL from the Court of Appeal :@0.482953:0.626505:0.774873:0.626505:0.774873:0.610726:0.482953:0.610726:0.014498:0.011332:0.011332:0.012582:0.014498:0.011977:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006039:0.005041
This was an appeal, with leave of the House (Lord Slynn of Hadley, Lord Steyn and Lord :@0.121066:0.642992:0.847704:0.642992:0.847704:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010687:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
Rodger of Earls ferry) granted on 25 April 2002, by the defendants, Sean McCann, Michael :@0.121066:0.659503:0.864682:0.659503:0.864682:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.009437:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.017643:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
McCann and Joseph McCann, against a decision of the Court of Appeal (Lord Phillips of :@0.121066:0.675978:0.844515:0.675978:0.844515:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010159:0.010082:0.005041:0.008166:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.017643:0.008812:0.013852:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
Worth Matravers MR, Kennedy and Dyson LJj) dated 1 March 2001 dismissing their appeals :@0.121066:0.692013:0.878353:0.692013:0.878353:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.018893:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.017643:0.013227:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.006059:0.011977:0.008166:0.005646:0.006993:0.005075:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.015728:0.005646:0.008166:0.007561:0.005646:0.010687:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041
from a decision of the Divisional Court of the Queen’s Bench Division (Lord Woolf CJ and :@0.121066:0.708500:0.865206:0.708500:0.865206:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.018893:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.008166:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Rafferty j) on 22 November 2000 to refuse the defendants’ application, by their mother and :@0.121066:0.725011:0.862696:0.725011:0.862696:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.013227:0.008812:0.006946:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006291:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
litigation friend Margaret McCann, for judicial review by way of an order of certiorari to :@0.121066:0.741486:0.843006:0.741486:0.843006:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.008186:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
quash the decision of Judge Rhys Davies QC, the Recorder of Manchester, and justices sitting :@0.121066:0.757973:0.883703:0.757973:0.883703:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008166:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.015103:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.015103:0.013227:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006560:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
in the Crown Court at Manchester on 16 May 2000 to uphold a decision of a stipendiary :@0.121066:0.774008:0.836392:0.774008:0.836392:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.010082:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.006291:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006291:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
magistrate to make anti-social behaviour orders against the defendants on the application of :@0.121066:0.790519:0.864846:0.790519:0.864846:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006049:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.006291:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.009437:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester. :@0.121066:0.806994:0.477912:0.806994:0.477912:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.006241:0.005041
99, :@0.121066:0.823481:0.151311:0.823481:0.151311:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.839956:0.501874:0.839956:0.501874:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007151:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006637:0.005041
52 :@0.121066:0.856027:0.146271:0.856027:0.146271:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E) :@0.121066:0.872502:0.515148:0.872502:0.515148:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.007424:0.005041
[2003] 1 AC :@0.121066:0.888989:0.228858:0.888989:0.228858:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.013930:0.005041
The facts are stated in the opinion of Lord Hope of Craighead. :@0.121066:0.905470:0.629241:0.905470:0.629241:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006402:0.005041