Page :@0.778032:0.944662:0.815035:0.944662:0.815035:0.931348:0.778032:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253
53:@0.815234:0.944662:0.831931:0.944662:0.831931:0.931348:0.815234:0.931348:0.008191:0.008507
 of :@0.832255:0.944662:0.854767:0.944662:0.854767:0.931348:0.832255:0.931348:0.003781:0.008813:0.005665:0.004253
139:@0.854351:0.944662:0.879854:0.944662:0.879854:0.931348:0.854351:0.931348:0.008183:0.008813:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
Clingham v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council :@0.121066:0.102000:0.704266:0.102000:0.704266:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.006459:0.005041
APPEAL from the Divisional Court of the Queen’s Bench Division :@0.121066:0.118511:0.671500:0.118511:0.671500:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.014498:0.011332:0.011332:0.012582:0.014498:0.011977:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005249:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.011292:0.005041
This was an appeal, with leave of the House granted on 23 October 2001, by the defendant, :@0.121066:0.134546:0.861536:0.134546:0.861536:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041
Andrew George Clingham, against a decision of the Divisional Court (Schiemann LJ and :@0.121066:0.151022:0.845062:0.151022:0.845062:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.011332:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.009437:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011977:0.008166:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Poole J) dated 11 January 2001 dismissing his appeal by way of case stated against a decision :@0.121066:0.167508:0.880685:0.167508:0.880685:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008166:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008166:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007938:0.015728:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
on the admissibility of evidence by District Judge David Kennett Brown, sitting as a :@0.121066:0.184019:0.804654:0.184019:0.804654:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008166:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.010082:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010687:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
magistrate at Marylebone Magistrates’ Court on :@0.121066:0.200506:0.513169:0.200506:0.513169:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.018248:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
14 September 2000:@0.513888:0.200506:0.677617:0.200506:0.677617:0.184727:0.513888:0.184727:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.008812:0.016998:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082
 at a pre-trial review of :@0.677801:0.200506:0.867955:0.200506:0.867955:0.184727:0.677801:0.184727:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008916:0.006923:0.005646:0.006291:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
an application by Kensington and Chelsea Royal London I3orough Council for an anti-social :@0.121066:0.216542:0.876293:0.216542:0.876293:0.200763:0.121066:0.200763:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010320:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010687:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006385:0.006923:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
behaviour order against the defendant. :@0.121066:0.233017:0.435653:0.233017:0.435653:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005478:0.005041
In refusing leave to appeal the Divisional Court certified, under section 1(2)  of the :@0.121066:0.249527:0.804429:0.249527:0.804429:0.233748:0.121066:0.233748:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014898:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
c :@0.738948:0.249527:0.752810:0.249527:0.752810:0.233748:0.738948:0.233748:0.008822:0.005041
Administration of justice Act i960, that the following point of law of general public :@0.121066:0.266002:0.800437:0.266002:0.800437:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.014498:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.006510:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.009457:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
importance was involved in its decision: “Whether hearsay evidence is admissible in :@0.121066:0.282489:0.807800:0.282489:0.807800:0.266710:0.121066:0.266710:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.009437:0.018893:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.006291:0.007561:0.007561:0.006291:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
proceedings to secure the making of an anti-social behaviour order under the Crime and :@0.121066:0.298525:0.834218:0.298525:0.834218:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006170:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Disorder Act 1998?” :@0.121066:0.315035:0.294423:0.315035:0.294423:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.009437:0.009003:0.005041
The facts are stated in the opinion of Lord Steyn. :@0.121066:0.331510:0.547275:0.331510:0.547275:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.013227:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.011332:0.005041:0.005646:0.011332:0.005041:0.006916:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.005646:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005545:0.013227:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.005041:0.010707:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.011332:0.004527:0.005041
Stephen Salley QC:@0.121066:0.347997:0.276770:0.347997:0.276770:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.013449
 and :@0.276797:0.347997:0.315837:0.347997:0.315837:0.332218:0.276797:0.332218:0.005024:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Alan Fraser:@0.315897:0.347997:0.416917:0.347997:0.416917:0.332218:0.315897:0.332218:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.007561:0.010687:0.007561:0.008812:0.007844
 for Clingham. Seen as a whole, the scheme provided for :@0.416749:0.347997:0.880735:0.347997:0.880735:0.332218:0.416749:0.332218:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008166:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.016373:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 for the making of and enforcement of anti-social :@0.121066:0.364472:0.817011:0.364472:0.817011:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006597:0.006284:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
behaviour orders is punitive, rather than preventative, and therefore truly criminal. The :@0.121066:0.380544:0.826962:0.380544:0.826962:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.006580:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.015728:0.005646:0.009457:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
sanctions for breach of such an order, which include imprisonment for a maximum of five :@0.121066:0.397019:0.851938:0.397019:0.851938:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
years, are clearly penal in nature. The proper application of the relevant criteria leads to the :@0.121066:0.413505:0.860568:0.413505:0.860568:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.004416:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
conclusion that it is properly categorised as criminal even in respect of ^ the initial imposition :@0.121066:0.429992:0.882668:0.429992:0.882668:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010848:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.009457:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
of the order looked at alone. Consequently, the usual, criminal procedures apply and the Civil :@0.121066:0.446503:0.880288:0.446503:0.880288:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006291:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
Evidence Act 1995 and the Magistrates’ Courts (Hearsay Evidence in Civil Proceedings) :@0.121066:0.462539:0.841877:0.462539:0.841877:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.011332:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041
Rules 1999 (SI 1999/681) do not. :@0.121066:0.479014:0.395964:0.479014:0.395964:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005296:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.004470:0.005041
The absence of any real restriction on the possible ambit of anti-social behaviour orders also :@0.121066:0.495489:0.870368:0.495489:0.870368:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006530:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041
presents the risk of ad hoc, novel and ill-defined “criminal offences” (founded on the terms of :@0.121066:0.512011:0.882641:0.512011:0.882641:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.006140:0.006940:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.015728:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
any such order), that is a matter of concern and possible injustice in that it is effectively :@0.121066:0.528486:0.831721:0.528486:0.831721:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010814:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.009437:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
creating “offences” attracting substantial penalties without the direct involvement of :@0.121066:0.544522:0.805763:0.544522:0.805763:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.006291:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.009437:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
Parliament and in circumstances lacking the sort of certainty that should characterise any :@0.121066:0.561009:0.842300:0.561009:0.842300:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.011332:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
prohibition carrying such penal sanctions. The fact that the conduct originally complained of :@0.121066:0.577484:0.873174:0.577484:0.873174:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.013130:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
is inevitably reflected in the formulation of the “offence”, it is an integral and inextricable :@0.121066:0.593994:0.849781:0.593994:0.849781:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.006291:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
part of a single process with punitive sanction. :@0.121066:0.610469:0.501235:0.610469:0.501235:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005649:0.005041
Geographical exclusion from a particular area is also properly regarded as punitive. It :@0.121066:0.626505:0.816833:0.626505:0.816833:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.006493:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006291:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041
encroaches on freedom of movement and may in some circumstances amount to an :@0.121066:0.642992:0.795944:0.642992:0.795944:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006291:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
infringement of the right to respect for private and family life (contrary to article 8 of the :@0.121066:0.659503:0.841655:0.659503:0.841655:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.009457:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.004416:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
Convention) and/or freedom of association (contrary to article 11). Although each of these :@0.121066:0.675978:0.855201:0.675978:0.855201:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007679:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008186:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041
rights is subject to restriction for reasons including the “prevention of crime and disorder” :@0.121066:0.692013:0.851192:0.692013:0.851192:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041
and the “protection of rights of others” that reinforces the argument that such, a sanction is a :@0.121066:0.708500:0.869481:0.708500:0.869481:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
punitive order. :@0.121066:0.725011:0.244652:0.725011:0.244652:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.004621:0.005041
Even if it is held that the proceedings are properly characterised as “civil”, defendants are :@0.121066:0.741486:0.847590:0.741486:0.847590:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010270:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.009437:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041
entitled to a “fair” hearing in accordance with article :@0.121066:0.757973:0.549604:0.757973:0.549604:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
6 :@0.550418:0.757973:0.565540:0.757973:0.565540:0.742194:0.550418:0.742194:0.010082:0.005041
(R):@0.565540:0.757973:0.593669:0.757973:0.593669:0.742194:0.565540:0.742194:0.006916:0.014498:0.006714
 “in :@0.593954:0.757973:0.628602:0.757973:0.628602:0.742194:0.593954:0.742194:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010109:0.005041
100, :@0.121066:0.774008:0.161393:0.774008:0.161393:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.790519:0.501874:0.790519:0.501874:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006872:0.005041
53 :@0.121066:0.806994:0.146271:0.806994:0.146271:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
[2003] 1 AC  R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E) :@0.121066:0.823481:0.636164:0.823481:0.636164:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.013930:0.005041:0.013274:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005152:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.007262:0.005041
A:@0.121066:0.839956:0.134515:0.839956:0.134515:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.013449
 determination of his civil] rights and obligations”. In determining what is “fair” in this :@0.134298:0.839956:0.840430:0.839956:0.840430:0.824177:0.134298:0.824177:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.006291:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006291:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041
context an almost (or “quasi”) criminal approach should be adopted not only in relation to the :@0.121066:0.856027:0.880813:0.856027:0.880813:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
standard of proof but in interpretation of wider procedural issues. In the circumstances that :@0.121066:0.872502:0.857396:0.872502:0.857396:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010579:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
would include having particular regard to the minimum requirements that would attach to :@0.121066:0.888989:0.847422:0.888989:0.847422:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
criminal proceedings under article 6(3), even if those did not directly apply g by virtue of :@0.121066:0.905470:0.845567:0.905470:0.845567:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.009457:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041