Page :@0.778032:0.944662:0.815035:0.944662:0.815035:0.931348:0.778032:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253
61:@0.815234:0.944662:0.831931:0.944662:0.831931:0.931348:0.815234:0.931348:0.008191:0.008507
 of :@0.832255:0.944662:0.854767:0.944662:0.854767:0.931348:0.832255:0.931348:0.003781:0.008813:0.005665:0.004253
139:@0.854351:0.944662:0.879854:0.944662:0.879854:0.931348:0.854351:0.931348:0.008183:0.008813:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
with the order. The difference in :@0.121066:0.102000:0.387952:0.102000:0.387952:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.006291:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
Ibbotson:@0.388403:0.102000:0.460709:0.102000:0.460709:0.086221:0.388403:0.086221:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.011211
 was that in that case separate proceedings would :@0.460908:0.102000:0.862524:0.102000:0.862524:0.086221:0.460908:0.086221:0.005663:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.009437:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.009437:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
have to be brought for a breach of the statutory obligation before any criminal sanction could :@0.121066:0.118511:0.875832:0.118511:0.875832:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006936:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
be imposed. The same is true under section 1 of the 1998 Act. :@0.121066:0.134546:0.625460:0.134546:0.625460:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008166:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.006190:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005222:0.005041
^ :@0.665821:0.134546:0.680322:0.134546:0.680322:0.118768:0.665821:0.118768:0.009460:0.005041
Steel v United Kingdom:@0.121066:0.151022:0.317400:0.151022:0.317400:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015687
 28 EHRR 603, :@0.317796:0.151022:0.447566:0.151022:0.447566:0.135243:0.317796:0.135243:0.005663:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Garyfallou AEBE v Greece :@0.447667:0.151022:0.678742:0.151022:0.678742:0.135243:0.447667:0.135243:0.014498:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.013852:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.015103:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041
28 EHRR 344 and :@0.679062:0.151022:0.833374:0.151022:0.833374:0.135243:0.679062:0.135243:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013852:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Lauko v Slovakia:@0.121066:0.167508:0.265881:0.167508:0.265881:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.012582:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082
 33 EHRR 994 merely illustrate the application in very different factual :@0.266076:0.167508:0.846985:0.167508:0.846985:0.151729:0.266076:0.151729:0.005679:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.006291:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
situations of the three criteria in :@0.121066:0.184019:0.382810:0.184019:0.382810:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
Engel v The Netherlands (No 1) 1:@0.383362:0.184019:0.664561:0.184019:0.664561:0.168240:0.383362:0.168240:0.013227:0.011332:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.007296:0.005041:0.010082
 EHRR 647 without :@0.664561:0.184019:0.830824:0.184019:0.830824:0.168240:0.664561:0.168240:0.005679:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
adding any points of principle. :@0.121066:0.200506:0.373246:0.200506:0.373246:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005397:0.005041
___ :@0.423689:0.200506:0.459009:0.200506:0.459009:0.184727:0.423689:0.184727:0.010082:0.010082:0.010115:0.005041
Applying the criminal standard of proof is wrong in three respects. First, it undermines one of :@0.121066:0.216542:0.881498:0.216542:0.881498:0.200763:0.121066:0.200763:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.009457:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
the purposes of section 1 of the 1998 Act, namely, to render it easier to obtain an anti-social :@0.121066:0.233017:0.866832:0.233017:0.866832:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.009437:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006721:0.006923:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
behaviour order than it would be to obtain a conviction for a comparable offence. Second, it :@0.121066:0.249527:0.867148:0.249527:0.867148:0.233748:0.121066:0.233748:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010169:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008186:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
conflates the two elements in section 1 of the 1998 Act. There is no reason why the criminal :@0.121066:0.266002:0.868876:0.266002:0.868876:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010687:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
standard should be applied in relation to the question whether section I.(1 )(b) is satisfied: :@0.121066:0.282489:0.849714:0.282489:0.849714:0.266710:0.121066:0.266710:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.007938:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
that is a matter of evaluation as to future risk, and simply does not lend itself to being tested :@0.121066:0.298525:0.865609:0.298525:0.865609:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
by reference to the criminal standard of proof. Third, in relation to the issues generally under :@0.121066:0.315035:0.873876:0.315035:0.873876:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.004416:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.004416:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
section 1, the Court of :@0.121066:0.331510:0.305765:0.331510:0.305765:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.007158:0.005041
108, :@0.121066:0.347997:0.161393:0.347997:0.161393:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.364472:0.501874:0.364472:0.501874:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005135:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006778:0.005041
[2003] AC :@0.121066:0.380544:0.213096:0.380544:0.213096:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.014498:0.013896:0.005041
61 :@0.121066:0.397019:0.146271:0.397019:0.146271:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E) :@0.121066:0.413505:0.515148:0.413505:0.515148:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.007424:0.005041
Lord Steyn :@0.121066:0.429992:0.216255:0.429992:0.216255:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010179:0.005041
Appeal’s approach subverts the proper classification of an anti- social behaviour order as :@0.121066:0.446503:0.843903:0.446503:0.843903:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006439:0.006940:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010687:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041
involving civil proceedings. :@0.121066:0.462539:0.351822:0.462539:0.351822:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005407:0.005041
The civil standard of proof should be regarded as a single fixed standard. However, the more :@0.121066:0.479014:0.874058:0.479014:0.874058:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.014498:0.009437:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041
serious the allegation the more cogent the evidence will need to be see :@0.121066:0.495489:0.692585:0.495489:0.692585:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008166:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041
in re H (Minors) :@0.693546:0.495489:0.837071:0.495489:0.837071:0.479710:0.693546:0.479710:0.005646:0.011332:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.005041:0.007541:0.017643:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041
(Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof):@0.121066:0.512011:0.410495:0.512011:0.410495:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.006916:0.011332:0.008812:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.006714
 [1996] AC 563. :@0.411087:0.512011:0.548536:0.512011:0.548536:0.496232:0.411087:0.496232:0.005663:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005138:0.005041
Solley QC:@0.121066:0.528486:0.204382:0.528486:0.204382:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.013449
 in reply. :@0.204275:0.528486:0.282342:0.528486:0.282342:0.512707:0.204275:0.512707:0.005679:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Kostovski v Netherlands:@0.282459:0.528486:0.482926:0.528486:0.482926:0.512707:0.282459:0.512707:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.009437:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010687:0.007844
 (1989) 12 EHRR. 434 and :@0.482953:0.528486:0.705957:0.528486:0.705957:0.512707:0.482953:0.512707:0.005679:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Saidi v France:@0.706148:0.528486:0.827796:0.528486:0.827796:0.512707:0.706148:0.512707:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.008953
 :@0.827836:0.528486:0.832877:0.528486:0.832877:0.512707:0.827836:0.512707:0.005041
(1993) 17 EHRR 251 involved a lack opportunity to examine witnesses. :@0.121066:0.544522:0.708047:0.544522:0.708047:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.006449:0.005041
The criminal standard of proof would not lie comfortably with the hearing of hearsay :@0.121066:0.561009:0.812236:0.561009:0.812236:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.004416:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
evidence under the Civil Evidence Act 1995. There should be a declaration of incompatibility :@0.121066:0.577484:0.881992:0.577484:0.881992:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010596:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006291:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998. :@0.121066:0.593994:0.507536:0.593994:0.507536:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006143:0.005041
Fulford QC:@0.121066:0.610469:0.218900:0.610469:0.218900:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.013449
 in reply. :@0.218776:0.610469:0.296843:0.610469:0.296843:0.594690:0.218776:0.594690:0.005679:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Raimondo v Italy:@0.296944:0.610469:0.439985:0.610469:0.439985:0.594690:0.296944:0.594690:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008953
 18 EHRR 237 and :@0.440072:0.610469:0.599493:0.610469:0.599493:0.594690:0.440072:0.594690:0.005713:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013852:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Guzzardi v Italy:@0.599617:0.610469:0.731931:0.610469:0.731931:0.594690:0.599617:0.594690:0.014498:0.011332:0.008166:0.007561:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008953
 3 EHRR 333 :@0.732025:0.610469:0.846672:0.610469:0.846672:0.594690:0.732025:0.594690:0.005663:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
involved very different proceedings from an anti-social behaviour order. See also :@0.121066:0.626505:0.781749:0.626505:0.781749:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006305:0.006923:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.004416:0.011634:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041
Krone-:@0.781846:0.626505:0.839608:0.626505:0.839608:0.610726:0.781846:0.610726:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.008845:0.006714
Verlog GmbH v Austria:@0.121066:0.642992:0.318125:0.642992:0.318125:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.013227:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.015728:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.011957:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082
 (Application No 28977/95) (unreported) 21 May 1997 and :@0.318418:0.642992:0.801432:0.642992:0.801432:0.627213:0.318418:0.627213:0.005679:0.006916:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Nottingham City Council v Zain (A Minor):@0.121066:0.659503:0.478366:0.659503:0.478366:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.011332:0.005041:0.006916:0.013227:0.005041:0.017643:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.006714
 [2002] 1 WLR 607. :@0.479173:0.659503:0.647506:0.659503:0.647506:0.643724:0.479173:0.643724:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005148:0.005041
Their Lordships took time for consideration. :@0.121066:0.675978:0.484852:0.675978:0.484852:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005619:0.005041
17 October. LORD STEYN :@0.121066:0.692013:0.351184:0.692013:0.351184:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.011977:0.014498:0.013227:0.014498:0.005041:0.011332:0.012582:0.012582:0.014498:0.014709:0.005041
My Lords, section 1. of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (“the Act”) provides for the making :@0.121066:0.708500:0.882651:0.708500:0.882651:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.017643:0.010082:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005448:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
of anti-social behaviour orders against any person aged ten years or over. It came into force :@0.121066:0.725011:0.863391:0.725011:0.863391:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005763:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041
on 1 April 1999. Between 1 April 1999 and 31. December 2001. magistrates in England and :@0.121066:0.741486:0.869118:0.741486:0.869118:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.012582:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Wales made 588 such orders and refused 19. It is important social legislation designed to :@0.121066:0.757973:0.843335:0.757973:0.843335:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.018893:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005269:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.006291:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
remedy a problem which the existing law failed to deal with satisfactorily. This is the first :@0.121066:0.774008:0.850466:0.774008:0.850466:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041
occasion on which the House has had to examine the implications of section 1. :@0.121066:0.790519:0.761632:0.790519:0.761632:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008166:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006641:0.005041
There are two appeals before the House. They are unrelated but raise overlapping issues. :@0.121066:0.806994:0.839612:0.806994:0.839612:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.014498:0.010082:0.005236:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006291:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041
Both cases involve the power of the magistrates’ court under section 1 of the Act, upon being :@0.121066:0.823481:0.878413:0.823481:0.878413:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015103:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
satisfied of statutory requirements, to make an anti-social behaviour order prohibiting a :@0.121066:0.839956:0.830995:0.839956:0.830995:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006402:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010529:0.005041:0.008822:0.005041
defendant from doing prescribed things. Breach of such an order may give rise to criminal :@0.121066:0.856027:0.852563:0.856027:0.852563:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
liability. That stage has, however, not been reached in either case. In the case of :@0.121066:0.872502:0.769429:0.872502:0.769429:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.007541:0.005041
Clingbam:@0.770470:0.872502:0.852254:0.872502:0.852254:0.856723:0.770470:0.856723:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015687
 no :@0.852469:0.872502:0.883336:0.872502:0.883336:0.856723:0.852469:0.856723:0.005663:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
order has been made. In the case of the :@0.121066:0.888989:0.439632:0.888989:0.439632:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
McCann:@0.440072:0.888989:0.512379:0.888989:0.512379:0.873210:0.440072:0.873210:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011211
 breathers antisocial behaviour orders have :@0.512611:0.888989:0.864144:0.888989:0.864144:0.873210:0.512611:0.873210:0.005679:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005868:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008899:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
been made against all three. The appeals are therefore concerned only with the first stage of :@0.121066:0.905470:0.863815:0.905470:0.863815:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041