Page :@0.778032:0.944662:0.815035:0.944662:0.815035:0.931348:0.778032:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253
65:@0.815234:0.944662:0.831931:0.944662:0.831931:0.931348:0.815234:0.931348:0.008191:0.008507
 of :@0.832255:0.944662:0.854767:0.944662:0.854767:0.931348:0.832255:0.931348:0.003781:0.008813:0.005665:0.004253
139:@0.854351:0.944662:0.879854:0.944662:0.879854:0.931348:0.854351:0.931348:0.008183:0.008813:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
Pursuant to an order by the judge a hearsay notice was served on the defendant. The :@0.121066:0.102000:0.802941:0.102000:0.802941:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.011332:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
defendant challenged the validity of the hearsay notice on :@0.121066:0.118511:0.592056:0.118511:0.592056:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.011480:0.005041
112, :@0.121066:0.134546:0.161393:0.134546:0.161393:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.151022:0.501874:0.151022:0.501874:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006872:0.005041
[2003] 1 AC :@0.121066:0.167508:0.228236:0.167508:0.228236:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.013913:0.005041
65 :@0.121066:0.184019:0.146271:0.184019:0.146271:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E) :@0.121066:0.200506:0.515148:0.200506:0.515148:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.007424:0.005041
Lord Steyn :@0.121066:0.216542:0.216255:0.216542:0.216255:0.200763:0.121066:0.200763:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010179:0.005041
the ground that it did not identify the makers of the hearsay statements. At a pre-trial review :@0.121066:0.233017:0.869864:0.233017:0.869864:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010502:0.006940:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041
the district judge ruled that on reflection, the 1999 Rules did not apply as the borough’s :@0.121066:0.249527:0.832158:0.249527:0.832158:0.233748:0.121066:0.233748:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006069:0.010082:0.010687:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041
supporting material involved no hearsay. The judge stated a case for the decision of the :@0.121066:0.266002:0.829234:0.266002:0.829234:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010687:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
Divisional Court which raised questions about the admissibility of hearsay evidence in the :@0.121066:0.282489:0.852462:0.282489:0.852462:0.266710:0.121066:0.266710:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.008166:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
proceedings under section 1(1) of the Act. :@0.121066:0.298525:0.465949:0.298525:0.465949:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005528:0.005041
In the Divisional Court [2001] EWHC Admin 582 the view of the district judge as to what :@0.121066:0.315035:0.854230:0.315035:0.854230:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005982:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.012582:0.018893:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
amounted to hearsay evidence was rejected. In an unreported judgment Schiemann. I., J :@0.121066:0.331510:0.834776:0.331510:0.834776:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.016373:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006066:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.005041:0.008207:0.005041
observed that “If the policeman could only say that he had been told by such persons [who :@0.121066:0.347997:0.855225:0.347997:0.855225:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
had seen the behaviour in question] that Mr Clingham had behaved in an anti-social manner :@0.121066:0.364472:0.867343:0.364472:0.867343:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008963:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.017643:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006419:0.006940:0.008166:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
that would be hearsay evidence of the behaviour”: para 15. Relying on the then unreported :@0.121066:0.380544:0.856415:0.380544:0.856415:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
decisions of the Divisional Court in :@0.121066:0.397019:0.412512:0.397019:0.412512:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
R (McCann) v Crown Court at Manchester:@0.412969:0.397019:0.770269:0.397019:0.770269:0.381240:0.412969:0.381240:0.013227:0.005041:0.006916:0.017643:0.009437:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.013227:0.011332:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011957:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.017643:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.009437:0.007844
 [2001] 1 :@0.770470:0.397019:0.849851:0.397019:0.849851:0.381240:0.770470:0.381240:0.005663:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041
WI. R 358 and :@0.121066:0.413505:0.244592:0.413505:0.244592:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.018893:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.013291:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
B v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary:@0.244652:0.413505:0.715696:0.413505:0.715696:0.397727:0.244652:0.397727:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.008166:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005646:0.010687:0.007561:0.008953
 [2001] 1 WLR 340 :@0.716264:0.413505:0.881276:0.413505:0.881276:0.397727:0.716264:0.397727:0.005679:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010687:0.010082:0.006291:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.012582:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
the Divisional Court ruled that the proceedings were not criminal proceedings under domestic :@0.121066:0.429992:0.882063:0.429992:0.882063:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010687:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
law and did not involve a criminal charge under article 6. In these circumstances Schiemann :@0.121066:0.446503:0.869991:0.446503:0.869991:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.009947:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
LJ concluded, in paras 19-20: :@0.121066:0.462539:0.365046:0.462539:0.365046:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.011977:0.008166:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010344:0.006940:0.010082:0.010082:0.005663:0.005041
“The |hearsay] evidence can be admitted. If its weight is slight or it is not probative the judge :@0.121066:0.479014:0.875711:0.479014:0.875711:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.008812:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.003791:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010687:0.006291:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
can say so. If he comes to an unlawful conclusion his decision can be appealed ... In the light :@0.121066:0.495489:0.874622:0.495489:0.874622:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
of this judgment, it is unnecessary for us to make any order. The matter will remain to be :@0.121066:0.512011:0.843970:0.512011:0.843970:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005360:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008166:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008186:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
dealt with by the magistrates’ court. That court will consider the evidence on the basis that it :@0.121066:0.528486:0.870650:0.528486:0.870650:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
is hearsay evidence and therefore subject to the criticisms which can be made of hearsay :@0.121066:0.544522:0.837985:0.544522:0.837985:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.015728:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010687:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
evidence. The court will have to consider what weight to give to the evidence in the light of :@0.121066:0.561009:0.864535:0.561009:0.864535:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.008812:0.010082:0.005681:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.006291:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
those criticisms. I do not consider it appropriate for this court to express any views as to :@0.121066:0.577484:0.834255:0.577484:0.834255:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.015728:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.009437:0.014498:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
weight.” :@0.121066:0.593994:0.194831:0.593994:0.194831:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008919:0.005041
Poole [ took the same view, at paras 21 and 22. :@0.121066:0.610469:0.506898:0.610469:0.506898:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006150:0.005041
The McCann cases:@0.121066:0.626505:0.279599:0.626505:0.279599:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.012582:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.009000:0.007844
 :@0.279939:0.626505:0.284980:0.626505:0.284980:0.610726:0.279939:0.610726:0.005041
I gratefully refer to the account given by my noble and learned friend Lord Hope of :@0.121066:0.642992:0.799109:0.642992:0.799109:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.008186:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
Craighead of the background to these cases. I can therefore deal with the matter briefly. :@0.121066:0.659503:0.832359:0.659503:0.832359:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.013227:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007541:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Between May and September 1999 die Chief Constable of Greater Manchester collected :@0.121066:0.675978:0.838546:0.675978:0.838546:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.013227:0.008812:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.018248:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.006291:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.006711:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
evidence with a view to seeking anti-social behaviour orders against the three McCann :@0.121066:0.692013:0.824684:0.692013:0.824684:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006093:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
brothers who were then respectively aged 13, 15 and 16. They had been accused by various :@0.121066:0.708500:0.862867:0.708500:0.862867:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010687:0.007561:0.009437:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041
members of the public of criminal activity and other anti-social behaviour including burglary, :@0.121066:0.725011:0.881881:0.725011:0.881881:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.015728:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006530:0.006923:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.009070:0.005646:0.009457:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
theft, threatening and abusive behaviour, and criminal damage in the Beswick area of :@0.121066:0.741486:0.814131:0.741486:0.814131:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.009437:0.007561:0.014498:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.009437:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
Manchester. Complaints were duly lodged by the Chief Constable against them. The :@0.121066:0.757973:0.807256:0.757973:0.807256:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.006291:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010687:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.016373:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
applications sought various prohibitions against them including orders excluding them from :@0.121066:0.774008:0.867894:0.774008:0.867894:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.011016:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010687:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041
Beswick. The seriousness and persistence of their alleged anti-social behaviour is dearly :@0.121066:0.790519:0.838180:0.790519:0.838180:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.013227:0.008812:0.007561:0.014498:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008166:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008166:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.006291:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006459:0.006923:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
described by Lord Hope of Craighead, (he evidences against them consisted of oral evidence :@0.121066:0.806994:0.873332:0.806994:0.873332:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005444:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.007682:0.005041:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.006291:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041
of eye witnesses, as well as hearsay evidence consisting of a number of witness statements, :@0.121066:0.823481:0.860084:0.823481:0.860084:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.015103:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007541:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008166:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041
and police evidence of what had been reported to them by complainants. :@0.121066:0.839956:0.710567:0.839956:0.710567:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.006530:0.005041
A stipendiary magistrate found the requirements of section 1(1) satisfied and made anti-social :@0.121066:0.856027:0.882594:0.856027:0.882594:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.014498:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008267:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006133:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
behaviour orders against all three McCann brothers on 15 December 1999. Each order :@0.121066:0.872502:0.821834:0.872502:0.821834:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.013852:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.008812:0.009437:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
provided as follows: :@0.121066:0.888989:0.290642:0.888989:0.290642:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.014498:0.007561:0.005868:0.005041
113, :@0.121066:0.905470:0.161393:0.905470:0.161393:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041