Page :@0.778032:0.944662:0.815035:0.944662:0.815035:0.931348:0.778032:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253
66:@0.815234:0.944662:0.831931:0.944662:0.831931:0.931348:0.815234:0.931348:0.008191:0.008507
 of :@0.832255:0.944662:0.854767:0.944662:0.854767:0.931348:0.832255:0.931348:0.003781:0.008813:0.005665:0.004253
139:@0.854351:0.944662:0.879854:0.944662:0.879854:0.931348:0.854351:0.931348:0.008183:0.008813:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.102000:0.501874:0.102000:0.501874:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006872:0.005041
[2003] 1 AC :@0.121066:0.118511:0.228236:0.118511:0.228236:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.013913:0.005041
66 :@0.121066:0.134546:0.148161:0.134546:0.148161:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.010712:0.011342:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E) :@0.121066:0.151022:0.515148:0.151022:0.515148:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005185:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.007279:0.005041
Lord Steyn :@0.121066:0.167508:0.216255:0.167508:0.216255:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010179:0.005041
“[The defendant] is prohibited from entering the Beswick area as defined, edged in red, on :@0.121066:0.184019:0.855709:0.184019:0.855709:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.008812:0.006916:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006291:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.007561:0.014498:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.009437:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
the map attached- [The defendant] is prohibited from using or engaging in any abusive, :@0.121066:0.200506:0.829563:0.200506:0.829563:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010327:0.006940:0.005041:0.006916:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006291:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041
insulting, offensive, threatening or intimidating language or behaviour in any public place in :@0.121066:0.216542:0.871262:0.216542:0.871262:0.200763:0.121066:0.200763:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006177:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.009457:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
the City of Manchester. [The defendant] is prohibited from threatening or engaging in :@0.121066:0.233017:0.817922:0.233017:0.817922:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006291:0.005041:0.006291:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008186:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
violence or damage against any person or property within the City of Manchester. [The :@0.121066:0.249527:0.829315:0.249527:0.829315:0.233748:0.121066:0.233748:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007541:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.006291:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
defendant] is prohibited from encouraging any other person to engage in any of the acts :@0.121066:0.266002:0.831627:0.266002:0.831627:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006291:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.016124:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041
described in paragraphs a and 3 within the City of Manchester.” :@0.121066:0.282489:0.641843:0.282489:0.641843:0.266710:0.121066:0.266710:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010213:0.005041
The defendants appealed to the Crown Court. :@0.121066:0.298525:0.493035:0.298525:0.493035:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.010082:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.006160:0.005041
Sir Rhys Davies QC, the Recorder of Manchester, sat with two magistrates. After a review of :@0.121066:0.315035:0.877748:0.315035:0.877748:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.011332:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.013227:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
the domestic and European case law he concluded that the proceedings under section 1(1) are :@0.121066:0.331510:0.879058:0.331510:0.879058:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.009437:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041
correctly to be classified as civil under domestic law and for the purposes of article   The :@0.121066:0.347997:0.852389:0.347997:0.852389:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.009437:0.014498:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.011036:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.015345:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
6.:@0.795709:0.347997:0.810831:0.347997:0.810831:0.332218:0.795709:0.332218:0.010082:0.005041
recorder then turned to the argument that, despite this classification, the criminal standard :@0.121066:0.364472:0.848571:0.364472:0.848571:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.009437:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
should apply under section 1(1). He cited an observation in :@0.121066:0.380544:0.602090:0.380544:0.602090:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
B v Chief Constable of Avon and :@0.602776:0.380544:0.881700:0.380544:0.881700:0.364765:0.602776:0.364765:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006291:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041
Somerset Constabulary:@0.121066:0.397019:0.313831:0.397019:0.313831:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.008166:0.008953
 [2.00:1) 1 WLR 340, 354, para 31, where Lord Bingham of Cornhill :@0.314015:0.397019:0.877173:0.397019:0.877173:0.381240:0.314015:0.381240:0.005663:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010273:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010687:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.009437:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
CJ described, in the context of section z of the Act, which deals with orders against sex :@0.121066:0.413505:0.828044:0.413505:0.828044:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.013227:0.008166:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006291:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
offenders, the heightened civil standard of proof as “for all practical purposes . . . :@0.121066:0.429992:0.780156:0.429992:0.780156:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.005041:0.005041:0.005041:0.005041:0.005041
indistinguishable from the criminal standard”. I the recorder stated: :@0.121066:0.446503:0.668980:0.446503:0.668980:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010717:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.006046:0.005041
“Having considered this authority and the arguments, we are satisfied that the standard to be :@0.121066:0.462539:0.869501:0.462539:0.869501:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.008812:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.015103:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.006291:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
applied is the civil standard, but how are we to give effect to the guidance of the Lord Chief :@0.121066:0.479014:0.865750:0.479014:0.865750:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
Justice, that is to apply the civil standard with the strictness appropriate to the seriousness of :@0.121066:0.495489:0.869891:0.495489:0.869891:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.008166:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008092:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.008166:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008166:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
the matters to be proved and the implications of proving them. This is not an easy task and :@0.121066:0.512011:0.854439:0.512011:0.854439:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
we have brought to bear the judicial experience of all three of us which, it is has to be said, is :@0.121066:0.528486:0.875832:0.528486:0.875832:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.014498:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041
considerable, and we have concluded that in reality it is difficult to establish reliable :@0.121066:0.544522:0.804503:0.544522:0.804503:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.008812:0.010082:0.010092:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
gradations between a heightened civil standard commensurate with [the] seriousness and :@0.121066:0.561009:0.840505:0.561009:0.840505:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006291:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008166:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
implications of proving the requirements, and the criminal standard. And we have concluded :@0.121066:0.577484:0.873806:0.577484:0.873806:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.009910:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
chat for the purposes of this particular case, and we do not intend to lay down any form of :@0.121066:0.593994:0.852019:0.593994:0.852019:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.009437:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
precedent, so I emphasise that for the purposes of this particular case, we will apply the :@0.121066:0.610469:0.830780:0.610469:0.830780:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.005212:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008166:0.008976:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.015103:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.009437:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
standard of being satisfied so that we are sure that the conditions are fulfilled before we :@0.121066:0.626505:0.831906:0.626505:0.831906:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.006503:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005041
would consider the making of an order in the case of each [defendant] severally, because, of :@0.121066:0.642992:0.867706:0.642992:0.867706:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006291:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010687:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
course, each case must be considered separately.” :@0.121066:0.659503:0.527112:0.659503:0.527112:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010092:0.005041
This is an important observation, by a highly experienced judge, to which I must in due :@0.121066:0.675978:0.831607:0.675978:0.831607:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.008166:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.011144:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
course return.   :@0.121066:0.692013:0.247173:0.692013:0.247173:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005192:0.005041:0.005075:0.005041
The defendants appealed to the Divisional Court. Lord Woolf CJ (with the agreement of :@0.121066:0.708500:0.836170:0.708500:0.836170:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.008166:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.008186:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
Rafferty :@0.121066:0.725011:0.193433:0.725011:0.193433:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.013227:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
J) :@0.193571:0.725011:0.215610:0.725011:0.215610:0.709232:0.193571:0.709232:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
ruled that the proceedings under section 1(1) were properly to be classified under :@0.215634:0.725011:0.874138:0.725011:0.874138:0.709232:0.215634:0.709232:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
domestic law and under article 6 of the European Convention as civil proceedings and not :@0.121066:0.741486:0.851411:0.741486:0.851411:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.006368:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010687:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
criminal proceedings. The court dismissed the appeal: R (:@0.121066:0.757973:0.585375:0.757973:0.585375:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.015728:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.005041:0.006714
McCann) v Croum Court at :@0.586393:0.757973:0.821884:0.757973:0.821884:0.742194:0.586393:0.742194:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.011332:0.015728:0.005041:0.013852:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
Manchester:@0.121066:0.774008:0.218940:0.774008:0.218940:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.017643:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.007844
 [2.001] 1 WLR 3 58, :@0.219414:0.774008:0.399745:0.774008:0.399745:0.758229:0.219414:0.758229:0.005663:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.019518:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005817:0.005041
 The defendants then appealed to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division). The leading judgment :@0.121066:0.790519:0.877102:0.790519:0.877102:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
was given by Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR; Kennedy and Dyson IJJ agreed: :@0.121066:0.806994:0.811261:0.806994:0.811261:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005175:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.018248:0.013227:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010687:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008166:0.008166:0.005041:0.008186:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
R :@0.812091:0.806994:0.830365:0.806994:0.830365:0.791215:0.812091:0.791215:0.013232:0.005041
(McCann) 1/ Crown:@0.121066:0.823481:0.288445:0.823481:0.288445:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.006916:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.013227:0.011211
 :@0.289382:0.823481:0.294423:0.823481:0.294423:0.807702:0.289382:0.807702:0.005041
114, :@0.121066:0.839956:0.161393:0.839956:0.161393:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.856027:0.501874:0.856027:0.501874:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006872:0.005041
66 :@0.121066:0.872502:0.148161:0.872502:0.148161:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.010712:0.011342:0.005041
[2003] I AC   :@0.121066:0.888989:0.247173:0.888989:0.247173:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.014568:0.005041:0.015156:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E) :@0.121066:0.905470:0.515148:0.905470:0.515148:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.007424:0.005041