Page   of :@0.786887:0.944662:0.854776:0.944662:0.854776:0.931348:0.786887:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253:0.008365:0.004419:0.008813:0.005036:0.004253
5:@0.824055:0.944662:0.832562:0.944662:0.832562:0.931348:0.824055:0.931348:0.008507
139:@0.854973:0.944662:0.879861:0.944662:0.879861:0.931348:0.854973:0.931348:0.008191:0.008191:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
Page::@0.121066:0.102000:0.169368:0.102000:0.169368:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.012582:0.010082:0.010102:0.008822:0.006714
  5 :@0.169593:0.102000:0.194193:0.102000:0.194193:0.086221:0.169593:0.086221:0.005075:0.005041:0.009443:0.005041
 :@0.242132:0.102000:0.247173:0.102000:0.247173:0.086221:0.242132:0.086221:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL (E)) :@0.121066:0.118511:0.526490:0.118511:0.526490:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.005041:0.006916:0.013227:0.006916:0.006809:0.005041
Lord Hope of Craighead :@0.121066:0.134546:0.324097:0.134546:0.324097:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010952:0.005041
An order is necessary to protect persons in the area, and consultation between them is :@0.121066:0.151022:0.815422:0.151022:0.815422:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008166:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006291:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041
required before the application is made. Thus, the proceedings are identified from the outset :@0.121066:0.167508:0.866940:0.167508:0.866940:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
as preventive in character rather than punitive or disciplinary. This is a strong indication that :@0.121066:0.184019:0.872277:0.184019:0.872277:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006042:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
they are not proceedings for the determination of a criminal charge against the defendant. In :@0.121066:0.200506:0.868210:0.200506:0.868210:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
Lattko v Slovakia:@0.121066:0.216542:0.265841:0.216542:0.265841:0.200763:0.121066:0.200763:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082
 :@0.266076:0.216542:0.271117:0.216542:0.271117:0.200763:0.266076:0.200763:0.005041
33 EHRR 9514, ion, para 58 the court said that the fine imposed in that :@0.271117:0.216542:0.849068:0.216542:0.849068:0.200763:0.271117:0.200763:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.009457:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
case was intended as a punishment to deter re-offending and that it had 6 “a punitive :@0.121066:0.233017:0.807168:0.233017:0.807168:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009346:0.006940:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
character, which is the customary distinguishing feature of criminal penalties”. In :@0.121066:0.249527:0.782515:0.249527:0.782515:0.233748:0.121066:0.233748:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
Guzzardi v :@0.783745:0.249527:0.876961:0.249527:0.876961:0.233748:0.783745:0.233748:0.014498:0.011332:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
Italy:@0.121066:0.266002:0.159004:0.266002:0.159004:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.007561:0.005646:0.010107:0.005671:0.008953
 (3980) 3 EHRR 333, 369-37°, para o the court said that proceedings under which the :@0.158873:0.266002:0.853024:0.266002:0.853024:0.250223:0.158873:0.250223:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010263:0.006973:0.010082:0.010082:0.008166:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
applicant, as a suspected Mafioso, had been placed under special supervision with an :@0.121066:0.282489:0.810381:0.282489:0.810381:0.266710:0.121066:0.266710:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.017643:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.015103:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
obligation of compulsory residence within a restricted area did not involve the determination :@0.121066:0.298525:0.874354:0.298525:0.874354:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008079:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
of a criminal charge against him within the meaning of C article  see also :@0.121066:0.315035:0.715545:0.315035:0.715545:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.015728:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008953:0.005847:0.005075:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041
.:@0.638045:0.315035:0.643086:0.315035:0.643086:0.299256:0.638045:0.299256:0.005041
Raimondo v Italy :@0.716264:0.315035:0.864204:0.315035:0.864204:0.299256:0.716264:0.299256:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
18 EHRR 137. In :@0.121066:0.331510:0.267212:0.331510:0.267212:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
M v Italy :@0.267337:0.331510:0.346660:0.331510:0.346660:0.315731:0.267337:0.315731:0.017643:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
(199r) 70 DR 59, the commission held that article 6(2) did not :@0.346781:0.331510:0.854139:0.331510:0.854139:0.315731:0.346781:0.315731:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.015728:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010687:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
apply to confiscation of property belonging to a person suspected of being a member of a :@0.121066:0.347997:0.845866:0.347997:0.845866:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005824:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.009437:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
mafia- type organisation. In neither of these cases was the imposition of the order regarded as :@0.121066:0.364472:0.879717:0.364472:0.879717:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.015728:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008897:0.006965:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041
being punitive. In :@0.121066:0.380544:0.269007:0.380544:0.269007:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
Gough v Chief Constable of the Derbyshire Constabulary:@0.269235:0.380544:0.744735:0.380544:0.744735:0.364765:0.269235:0.364765:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.011332:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011957:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008953
 :@0.745249:0.380544:0.750290:0.380544:0.750290:0.364765:0.745249:0.364765:0.005041
[2002] QB 459 :@0.750290:0.380544:0.877563:0.380544:0.877563:0.364765:0.750290:0.364765:0.007541:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
the Divisional Court held that the imposition of a banning order under the Football :@0.121066:0.397019:0.792761:0.397019:0.792761:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005710:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
(Spectators) Act 1989 as amended by the Football (Disorder) Act 2000, which was designed :@0.121066:0.413505:0.869077:0.413505:0.869077:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.006916:0.011332:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
to combat what Laws I.J described as “the shame and menace of football hooliganism”, was :@0.121066:0.429992:0.867041:0.429992:0.867041:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.011977:0.008812:0.015103:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.008166:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041
not in conflict with article 6. This decision has been affirmed by the Court of Appeal [2002] :@0.121066:0.446503:0.867666:0.446503:0.867666:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.006291:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.005646:0.006916:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041
QB 1 2T 3. :@0.121066:0.462539:0.216877:0.462539:0.216877:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010115:0.012582:0.005041:0.010082:0.005061:0.005041
 :@0.121066:0.479014:0.126107:0.479014:0.126107:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.005041
In contrast to those decisions, which support the proposition that a distinction is drawn :@0.121066:0.495489:0.824213:0.495489:0.824213:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006291:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008166:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041
between proceedings for the imposition of preventive measures and those for the imposition :@0.121066:0.512011:0.867626:0.512011:0.867626:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
of a penalty or punishment, there is :@0.121066:0.528486:0.410774:0.528486:0.410774:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010220:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041
Steel v United Kingdom:@0.411087:0.528486:0.607420:0.528486:0.607420:0.512707:0.411087:0.512707:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015687
 :@0.607800:0.528486:0.612841:0.528486:0.612841:0.512707:0.607800:0.512707:0.005041
28 FJIRR 603, In that case the :@0.612858:0.528486:0.861576:0.528486:0.861576:0.512707:0.612858:0.512707:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.008166:0.006916:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
court held that article 6(3) applied to proceedings in which the applicants, who had been :@0.121066:0.544522:0.836795:0.544522:0.836795:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
arrested and charged with breach of the peace, were brought before a magistrate and bound :@0.121066:0.561009:0.861240:0.561009:0.861240:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.015103:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.011137:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
over to keep the peace. As in the case of applications for an anti-social behaviour order, the :@0.121066:0.577484:0.863411:0.577484:0.863411:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.015103:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006469:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010687:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
procedure is initiated under section 51 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 by a complaint, :@0.121066:0.593994:0.859439:0.593994:0.859439:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.009437:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041
and a bind over order   does not constitute a criminal conviction. It was contended foi the :@0.121066:0.610469:0.851511:0.610469:0.851511:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.011587:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005649:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010687:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
^:@0.298842:0.610469:0.310336:0.610469:0.310336:0.594690:0.298842:0.594690:0.011493
defendants that that decision is directly in point in this case and indistinguishable, and that :@0.121066:0.626505:0.853632:0.626505:0.853632:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010687:0.008812:0.010687:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
contention was strongly supported by Liberty.  :@0.121066:0.642992:0.503117:0.642992:0.503117:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011977:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006160:0.005041
 :@0.121066:0.659503:0.126107:0.659503:0.126107:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.005041
But I would hold that it is distinguishable, for the reasons which were given by Lord Phillips :@0.121066:0.675978:0.873732:0.675978:0.873732:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006066:0.011332:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041
of Worth Matravers MR. in the Court of Appeal in the :@0.121066:0.692013:0.563658:0.692013:0.563658:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.017643:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.017643:0.013227:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
McCann:@0.564297:0.692013:0.637229:0.692013:0.637229:0.676234:0.564297:0.676234:0.017643:0.009437:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.011211
 :@0.637424:0.692013:0.642465:0.692013:0.642465:0.676234:0.637424:0.676234:0.005041
case [2001] rWLRro84, :@0.642465:0.692013:0.845392:0.692013:0.845392:0.676234:0.642465:0.676234:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005122:0.008166:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005807:0.007541:0.018893:0.011977:0.013227:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
1100H—1 to b. As he pointed out, in contrast to proceedings for breach of the peace, there is :@0.121066:0.708500:0.881098:0.708500:0.881098:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.010687:0.010687:0.010687:0.011332:0.015250:0.020785:0.010720:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005108:0.015103:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041
no power of arrest for the purpose of proceedings under section 1 of the Crime and Disorder :@0.121066:0.725011:0.869817:0.725011:0.869817:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010841:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
Act 1998. The fact that a warrant may be issued for the defendant’s arrest if he fails to attend :@0.121066:0.741486:0.874522:0.741486:0.874522:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
the hearing or an adjourned hearing does not show that they are criminal proceedings. Rather :@0.121066:0.757973:0.875893:0.757973:0.875893:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.009437:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
it shows that he has failed to respond to a summons by the court. In itself this is far from :@0.121066:0.774008:0.839780:0.774008:0.839780:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008065:0.010082:0.015728:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041
conclusive, as there are numerous offences in English law which are non-arrestable. But it :@0.121066:0.790519:0.853451:0.790519:0.853451:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010687:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010932:0.006973:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.006291:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
has to be   taken together with the other factors. Proof of anti-social behaviour is not the only :@0.121066:0.806994:0.882305:0.806994:0.882305:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011429:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006352:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
^:@0.197352:0.806994:0.208845:0.806994:0.208845:0.791215:0.197352:0.791215:0.011493
criterion for the making of the order, nor is proof that the defendant is likely to cause further :@0.121066:0.823481:0.869460:0.823481:0.869460:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.004416:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.004416:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
anti-social acts in the future. 'the orders must be shown to be necessary for the purpose of :@0.121066:0.839956:0.847173:0.839956:0.847173:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005706:0.006931:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.003750:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.008812:0.008166:0.007561:0.009657:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
protecting people against further such behaviour by him. This is not a distinction of form :@0.121066:0.856027:0.843066:0.856027:0.843066:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.015728:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.015728:0.005041
rather than :@0.121066:0.872502:0.213096:0.872502:0.213096:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010226:0.005041
PART 5 © SWEET   MAXWELL :@0.121066:0.888989:0.427470:0.888989:0.427470:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.012582:0.014498:0.014498:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.015103:0.005041:0.011332:0.020164:0.013227:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.015939:0.005041:0.018893:0.014498:0.015103:0.020164:0.013227:0.013227:0.013940:0.005041
&:@0.292541:0.888989:0.308228:0.888989:0.308228:0.873210:0.292541:0.873210:0.015687
40, :@0.121066:0.905470:0.151311:0.905470:0.151311:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041