Page :@0.778032:0.944662:0.815035:0.944662:0.815035:0.931348:0.778032:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253
68:@0.815234:0.944662:0.831931:0.944662:0.831931:0.931348:0.815234:0.931348:0.008191:0.008507
 of :@0.832255:0.944662:0.854767:0.944662:0.854767:0.931348:0.832255:0.931348:0.003781:0.008813:0.005665:0.004253
139:@0.854351:0.944662:0.879854:0.944662:0.879854:0.931348:0.854351:0.931348:0.008183:0.008813:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
small in number, sometimes effectively silenced communities, bear of the consequences of :@0.121066:0.102000:0.857443:0.102000:0.857443:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.007561:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008166:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
complaining to the police dominated the thoughts of people: reporting incidents to the police :@0.121066:0.118511:0.873171:0.118511:0.873171:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005626:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041
entailed a serious risk of reprisals. :@0.121066:0.134546:0.401643:0.134546:0.401643:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.006170:0.005041
The criminal law by itself offered inadequate protection to them. There was a model available :@0.121066:0.151022:0.881982:0.151022:0.881982:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.004416:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
for remedial legislation. Before 1998 Parliament had, on a number of occasions, already used :@0.121066:0.167508:0.878033:0.167508:0.878033:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.011013:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
the technique of prohibiting by statutory injunction conduct deemed to be unacceptable and :@0.121066:0.184019:0.862625:0.184019:0.862625:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
making a breach of the g injunction punishable by penalties. It may be that the Company :@0.121066:0.200506:0.840586:0.200506:0.840586:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.013227:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Directors Disqualification Act 1986 was the precedent for subsequent use of the technique. :@0.121066:0.216542:0.859570:0.216542:0.859570:0.200763:0.121066:0.200763:0.014498:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005757:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041
The civil remedy of disqualification enabled the court to prohibit a person from acting as a :@0.121066:0.233017:0.855003:0.233017:0.855003:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006311:0.006916:0.010082:0.015123:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
director: section 1(1) of the 1986 Ac  :@0.121066:0.249527:0.435031:0.249527:0.435031:0.233748:0.121066:0.233748:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008953:0.014172:0.005041
t::@0.416128:0.249527:0.429773:0.249527:0.429773:0.233748:0.416128:0.233748:0.006931:0.006714
R v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, Ex p :@0.435031:0.249527:0.861956:0.249527:0.861956:0.233748:0.435031:0.233748:0.013227:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.012582:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041
McCormick:@0.121066:0.266002:0.218658:0.266002:0.218658:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.017643:0.008812:0.013227:0.010082:0.007561:0.015728:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082
 [1998] BCC 379,:@0.219414:0.266002:0.390301:0.266002:0.390301:0.250223:0.219414:0.250223:0.005663:0.008822:0.012602:0.012602:0.012602:0.012653:0.008191:0.006931:0.013852:0.014478:0.013852:0.005740:0.012602:0.012602:0.012653:0.005041
395C-F; :@0.399106:0.266002:0.479146:0.266002:0.479146:0.250223:0.399106:0.250223:0.012602:0.012602:0.012602:0.013274:0.006940:0.011332:0.005646:0.005041
Official Receiver v Stern:@0.479173:0.266002:0.682947:0.266002:0.682947:0.250223:0.479173:0.250223:0.014498:0.006916:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.011211
 [2.000] 1 WLR 2.2.30. :@0.683464:0.266002:0.878138:0.266002:0.878138:0.250223:0.683464:0.250223:0.005679:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010687:0.005041:0.018893:0.011977:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Breach of the order made available criminal penalties: sections 13 and 14 of the 1986 Act. In :@0.121066:0.282489:0.875187:0.282489:0.875187:0.266710:0.121066:0.266710:0.013227:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.009437:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
1994  Parliament created the power to prohibit trespassory assemblies which could result in :@0.121066:0.298525:0.872687:0.298525:0.872687:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.013913:0.011332:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.008166:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.009437:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
c :@0.166434:0.298525:0.180297:0.298525:0.180297:0.282746:0.166434:0.282746:0.008822:0.005041
serious disruption affecting communities, movements, and so forth: see section 70 of the :@0.121066:0.315035:0.840122:0.315035:0.840122:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007158:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 which amended Part II of the Public Order Act :@0.121066:0.331510:0.861375:0.331510:0.861375:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008166:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.009457:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
1986 by inserting section 14A. Section 14B which was introduced by the 1994 Act, created :@0.121066:0.347997:0.862161:0.347997:0.862161:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.013227:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
criminal offences in respect of breaches. In the field of family law, statute created the power :@0.121066:0.364472:0.870042:0.364472:0.870042:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010260:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008953:0.005989:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041
 :@0.809571:0.364472:0.814612:0.364472:0.814612:0.348693:0.809571:0.348693:0.005041
to make residence orders, requiring a defendant to leave a dwelling house; or non-molestation :@0.121066:0.380544:0.883148:0.380544:0.883148:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008166:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.011070:0.006973:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
orders, requiring a defendant to abstain from threatening an associated person: sections 3 3 :@0.121066:0.397019:0.857927:0.397019:0.857927:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008549:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008166:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041
(3)(4) and 42 of the Family Law Act 1996. The penalty for breach is punishment for :@0.121066:0.413505:0.805441:0.413505:0.805441:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.015728:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.011977:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
contempt of court. The Housing Act 1996 created the power to grant injunctions against :@0.121066:0.429992:0.844881:0.429992:0.844881:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005451:0.012602:0.012602:0.012602:0.012636:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.009457:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041
anti-social behaviour: section 152; section 153 (breach). This was, however, a power ^ :@0.121066:0.446503:0.832695:0.446503:0.832695:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005706:0.006931:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005574:0.012602:0.012602:0.012602:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.010334:0.010082:0.015103:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.009457:0.005041
severely restricted in respect of locality. A broadly similar technique was adopted in the :@0.121066:0.462539:0.834174:0.462539:0.834174:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006291:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
Protection from Harassment Act 1997: section 3; section 3(6) (breach). Post-dating the Crime :@0.121066:0.479014:0.881807:0.479014:0.881807:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.011332:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.006654:0.006923:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041
and Disorder Act 1998, which is the subject matter of the present appeals, Parliament adopted :@0.121066:0.495489:0.882789:0.495489:0.882789:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005686:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.006291:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
a similar model in sections 14A and 14J (breach) of the Football Spectators Act T989, :@0.121066:0.512011:0.820422:0.512011:0.820422:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008166:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
inserted by section 1(1) of and Schedule   to the Football (Disorder) Act 2000: :@0.121066:0.528486:0.763682:0.528486:0.763682:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010569:0.005663:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
1:@0.450826:0.528486:0.460908:0.528486:0.460908:0.512707:0.450826:0.512707:0.010082
Gough v :@0.764152:0.528486:0.840371:0.528486:0.840371:0.512707:0.764152:0.512707:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
Chief Constable of the Derbyshire Constabulary:@0.121066:0.544522:0.520874:0.544522:0.520874:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.013227:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.011332:0.005646:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.011880:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.008953
 [2002J QB 459. In all these cases the :@0.521449:0.544522:0.838865:0.544522:0.838865:0.528743:0.521449:0.528743:0.005663:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008166:0.005041:0.014498:0.013227:0.005132:0.012602:0.012602:0.012636:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041
requirements for the granting of the statutory injunction depend on the criteria specified in the :@0.121066:0.561009:0.883252:0.561009:0.883252:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.009457:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
particular statute. The unifying clement is, however, the use of the civil remedy of an :@0.121066:0.577484:0.812175:0.577484:0.812175:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
injunction to prohibit conduct considered to be utterly unacceptable, with a remedy of :@0.121066:0.593994:0.818245:0.593994:0.818245:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010445:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
criminal penalties in the event of disobedience. :@0.121066:0.610469:0.506276:0.610469:0.506276:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006335:0.005041
There is no doubt that Parliament intended to adopt the model of a civil remedy of an :@0.121066:0.626505:0.812821:0.626505:0.812821:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.009457:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
injunction, hacked up by criminal penalties, when its enacted section 1 of the Crime and :@0.121066:0.642992:0.836953:0.642992:0.836953:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010905:0.005041:0.007561:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
Disorder Act 1998. The view was taken that the proceedings for an anti-social behaviour :@0.121066:0.659503:0.841500:0.659503:0.841500:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.014498:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006476:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
order would be civil and would not attract the rigour of the inflexible and sometimes absurdly :@0.121066:0.675978:0.881458:0.675978:0.881458:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.015728:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
technical hearsay rule which applies in criminal cases. If this supposition was wrong, in the :@0.121066:0.692013:0.863190:0.692013:0.863190:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.006291:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.015103:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
sense that Parliament did not objectively achieve its aim, it would inevitably follow that the :@0.121066:0.708500:0.863673:0.708500:0.863673:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.011332:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.006291:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.015728:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.014498:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
procedure for obtaining anti-social behaviour orders is completely or virtually unworkable :@0.121066:0.725011:0.854765:0.725011:0.854765:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.006009:0.006940:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.009457:0.010082:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041
and useless. If that is what the law decrees, so be it. My starting point is, however, an initial :@0.121066:0.741486:0.865300:0.741486:0.865300:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008166:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005296:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.017643:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041
scepticism of an outcome which would deprive communities of their fundamental rights: sec :@0.121066:0.757973:0.873510:0.757973:0.873510:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.007827:0.005679:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010687:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041
Brown v Stott:@0.121066:0.774008:0.233700:0.774008:0.233700:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.013227:0.007561:0.010082:0.013227:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005605
 I2003] 1: AC 681, per Lord :@0.233898:0.774008:0.468469:0.774008:0.468469:0.758229:0.233898:0.758229:0.005713:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.015103:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010929:0.005041
116, :@0.121066:0.790519:0.161393:0.790519:0.161393:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.806994:0.501874:0.806994:0.501874:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006872:0.005041
68 :@0.121066:0.823481:0.148161:0.823481:0.148161:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.010712:0.011342:0.005041
[2003] 1 AC   :@0.121066:0.839956:0.247173:0.839956:0.247173:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.013930:0.005041:0.013274:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E):@0.121066:0.856027:0.509398:0.856027:0.509398:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.006714
 :@0.510107:0.856027:0.515148:0.856027:0.515148:0.840248:0.510107:0.840248:0.005041
Lord Steyn :@0.121066:0.872502:0.216255:0.872502:0.216255:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010179:0.005041
Bingham of Cornhill, at p 704E-F; per Lord Hope of Craighead, at pp 718G, 719B-C; my :@0.121066:0.888989:0.864336:0.888989:0.864336:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005387:0.011981:0.011981:0.011325:0.012636:0.006940:0.011332:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008186:0.006916:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005397:0.011981:0.011981:0.011997:0.014498:0.005041:0.005027:0.011332:0.011957:0.012048:0.013241:0.006923:0.013227:0.005646:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.005041
judgment, at p 707G-H. :@0.121066:0.905470:0.323459:0.905470:0.323459:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005246:0.011981:0.011981:0.011947:0.014501:0.006940:0.014493:0.004444:0.005041