Page :@0.778032:0.944662:0.815035:0.944662:0.815035:0.931348:0.778032:0.931348:0.009459:0.007554:0.008813:0.006924:0.004253
80:@0.815234:0.944662:0.831931:0.944662:0.831931:0.931348:0.815234:0.931348:0.008191:0.008507
 of :@0.832255:0.944662:0.854767:0.944662:0.854767:0.931348:0.832255:0.931348:0.003781:0.008813:0.005665:0.004253
139:@0.854351:0.944662:0.879854:0.944662:0.879854:0.931348:0.854351:0.931348:0.008183:0.008813:0.008507
 :@0.879556:0.944662:0.883809:0.944662:0.883809:0.931348:0.879556:0.931348:0.004253
 :@0.121066:0.958470:0.125319:0.958470:0.125319:0.945157:0.121066:0.945157:0.004253
it would be wrong to approach the article on the assumption that all that is in issue is the :@0.121066:0.102000:0.836715:0.102000:0.836715:0.086221:0.121066:0.086221:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008166:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
question as to which of these two descriptions better fits the nature of the proceedings. It is :@0.121066:0.118511:0.858149:0.118511:0.858149:0.102732:0.121066:0.102732:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.008166:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041
not a straight choice between one description and the other. It is possible that the proceedings :@0.121066:0.134546:0.878312:0.134546:0.878312:0.118768:0.121066:0.118768:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041
which are in. issue in a given case will fit neither description. In :@0.121066:0.151022:0.642441:0.151022:0.642441:0.135243:0.121066:0.135243:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.009437:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010932:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
Albert and Le Compte v :@0.642465:0.151022:0.843920:0.151022:0.843920:0.135243:0.642465:0.135243:0.013227:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
Belgium:@0.121066:0.167508:0.191498:0.167508:0.191498:0.151729:0.121066:0.151729:0.013227:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.011332:0.015687
 (1983) 5 EHRR 533,:@0.191689:0.167508:0.395292:0.167508:0.395292:0.151729:0.191689:0.151729:0.005024:0.009437:0.012582:0.012582:0.012582:0.012582:0.009437:0.007541:0.012582:0.007763:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005108:0.012602:0.012602:0.012602:0.005041
539,:@0.405374:0.167508:0.448221:0.167508:0.448221:0.151729:0.405374:0.151729:0.012602:0.012602:0.012602:0.005041
para 25:@0.458387:0.167508:0.520760:0.167508:0.520760:0.151729:0.458387:0.151729:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005068:0.012602:0.010082
the court observed that there are some :@0.530892:0.167508:0.841856:0.167508:0.841856:0.151729:0.530892:0.151729:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041
cases which are not comprised within either of these categories and which thus fall outside :@0.121066:0.184019:0.856253:0.184019:0.856253:0.168240:0.121066:0.168240:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.015728:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
the ambit of article 6(1). For example, in :@0.121066:0.200506:0.454613:0.200506:0.454613:0.184727:0.121066:0.184727:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
Ravnsborg v Sweden:@0.455228:0.200506:0.626522:0.200506:0.626522:0.184727:0.455228:0.184727:0.013227:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.011436:0.013227:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.011211
 (1994) r8 EHRR 38:@0.626703:0.200506:0.819653:0.200506:0.819653:0.184727:0.626703:0.184727:0.005058:0.009437:0.012582:0.012582:0.012582:0.012582:0.009437:0.007541:0.009437:0.012582:0.007803:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005108:0.012602:0.010082
the :@0.829735:0.200506:0.859315:0.200506:0.859315:0.184727:0.829735:0.184727:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
court held that article 6 did not apply to proceedings where the applicant had been fined for :@0.121066:0.216542:0.862605:0.216542:0.862605:0.200763:0.121066:0.200763:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
making improper statements in written observations before the Swedish courts. The :@0.121066:0.233017:0.800239:0.233017:0.800239:0.217238:0.121066:0.217238:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
proceedings were regarded as being outside the ambit of article 6 because they were :@0.121066:0.249527:0.804070:0.249527:0.804070:0.233748:0.121066:0.233748:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006291:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.006271:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041
disciplinary in character: p 51, para 34. In :@0.121066:0.266002:0.464050:0.266002:0.464050:0.250223:0.121066:0.250223:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010626:0.005041
128, :@0.121066:0.282489:0.161393:0.282489:0.161393:0.266710:0.121066:0.266710:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf :@0.121066:0.298525:0.501874:0.298525:0.501874:0.282746:0.121066:0.282746:0.011332:0.005646:0.016998:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005041:0.011332:0.011332:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.010707:0.016998:0.008812:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.009457:0.006916:0.005041:0.012582:0.010707:0.006872:0.005041
[2003] I AC :@0.121066:0.315035:0.224455:0.315035:0.224455:0.299256:0.121066:0.299256:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006311:0.005041:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.013298:0.005041
80 :@0.121066:0.331510:0.146271:0.331510:0.146271:0.315731:0.121066:0.315731:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Ct (HL(E) :@0.121066:0.347997:0.515148:0.347997:0.515148:0.332218:0.121066:0.332218:0.014498:0.005041:0.006916:0.018893:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.011332:0.011332:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.018893:0.010082:0.011332:0.008812:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.014498:0.011332:0.005041:0.014498:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.015728:0.013227:0.006916:0.013227:0.007424:0.005041
Lord Hope of Craighead :@0.121066:0.364472:0.324097:0.364472:0.324097:0.348693:0.121066:0.348693:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.013227:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010952:0.005041
A Raimondo v Italy:@0.121066:0.380544:0.282375:0.380544:0.282375:0.364765:0.121066:0.364765:0.013227:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008953
 (1994) 18 EHRR 237 the court held that article 6 did not apply to the :@0.282459:0.380544:0.849058:0.380544:0.849058:0.364765:0.282459:0.364765:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
proceedings which led to the applicant being placed under special police supervision. :@0.121066:0.397019:0.813973:0.397019:0.813973:0.381240:0.121066:0.381240:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010687:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006153:0.005041
The second aspect of the wording that is worth noting is that those parts of article 6 which :@0.121066:0.413505:0.851293:0.413505:0.851293:0.397727:0.121066:0.397727:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.009437:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041
refer to criminal proceedings make it clear that the essential feature of proceedings that have :@0.121066:0.429992:0.870030:0.429992:0.870030:0.414213:0.121066:0.414213:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.005106:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.009457:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008166:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
that character for the purposes of :@0.121066:0.446503:0.392183:0.446503:0.392183:0.430724:0.121066:0.430724:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.007356:0.005041
g the Convention is that the person is “charged with a criminal offence”. This expression is to :@0.121066:0.462539:0.880208:0.462539:0.880208:0.446760:0.121066:0.446760:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.009437:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
be interpreted as having an autonomous meaning in the context of the Convention: :@0.121066:0.479014:0.791938:0.479014:0.791938:0.463235:0.121066:0.463235:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.016158:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
Adolf v :@0.792550:0.479014:0.857396:0.479014:0.857396:0.463235:0.792550:0.463235:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041
Austria:@0.121066:0.495489:0.182122:0.495489:0.182122:0.479710:0.121066:0.479710:0.013227:0.011332:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082
 (1982) 4 EHRR 313, 322, para 30. So careful attention must be paid to the meaning :@0.182229:0.495489:0.865999:0.495489:0.865999:0.479710:0.182229:0.479710:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.011332:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
which has been attached to these words by the Strasbourg court. As is by now very well :@0.121066:0.512011:0.833811:0.512011:0.833811:0.496232:0.121066:0.496232:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.010687:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.005646:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041
known, the case law has established that there are three criteria to be considered. They are not :@0.121066:0.528486:0.882338:0.528486:0.882338:0.512707:0.121066:0.512707:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.009712:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.010687:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
always stated in precisely the same language, but they are usually said to be (1) the :@0.121066:0.544522:0.794593:0.544522:0.794593:0.528743:0.121066:0.528743:0.008812:0.005646:0.014498:0.008812:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.006291:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008166:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010687:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
classification of the proceedings under national law, (2) the nature of the offence and (3) the :@0.121066:0.561009:0.868876:0.561009:0.868876:0.545230:0.121066:0.545230:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.007561:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
nature and degree of severity of the penalty: :@0.121066:0.577484:0.481139:0.577484:0.481139:0.561705:0.121066:0.561705:0.010082:0.008822:0.005646:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
Engel u The Netherlands (No 1) 1:@0.481693:0.577484:0.765033:0.577484:0.765033:0.561705:0.481693:0.561705:0.013227:0.011332:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.011332:0.005041:0.012582:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082
 EHRR 647, :@0.765413:0.577484:0.869373:0.577484:0.869373:0.561705:0.765413:0.561705:0.005058:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
678-679, paras 82-83; :@0.121066:0.593994:0.303866:0.593994:0.303866:0.578215:0.121066:0.578215:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006931:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010201:0.006940:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041
Benham v United Kingdom:@0.303883:0.593994:0.530482:0.593994:0.530482:0.578215:0.303883:0.578215:0.013227:0.008812:0.011332:0.011332:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.011332:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.013227:0.005646:0.011332:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.015687
 22 EHRR 293, 323, para 56. :@0.530892:0.593994:0.770454:0.593994:0.770454:0.578215:0.530892:0.578215:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005219:0.005041
The words “criminal charge” themselves suggest that the proceedings which they have in :@0.121066:0.610469:0.844982:0.610469:0.844982:0.594690:0.121066:0.594690:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.015728:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010687:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
mind are not just proceedings where a :@0.121066:0.626505:0.433132:0.626505:0.433132:0.610726:0.121066:0.610726:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005169:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.009746:0.005041
“charge” is made. The question is whether they are proceedings which may result in the :@0.121066:0.642992:0.833650:0.642992:0.833650:0.627213:0.121066:0.627213:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.009437:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008166:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
imposition of a penalty. This point emerges clearly from the French text of article 6(r), as :@0.121066:0.659503:0.846111:0.659503:0.846111:0.643724:0.121066:0.643724:0.005646:0.015728:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.006916:0.010082:0.015728:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011332:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.006916:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041
Lord President Rodger pointed out in :@0.121066:0.675978:0.426419:0.675978:0.426419:0.660199:0.121066:0.660199:0.011972:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.013227:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
S v Miller z001 SC:@0.426848:0.675978:0.580878:0.675978:0.580878:0.660199:0.426848:0.660199:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.017643:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007709:0.005075:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.013449
 977, 988, para 21. It states that the :@0.580713:0.675978:0.868409:0.675978:0.868409:0.660199:0.580713:0.660199:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010687:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
matter which is to be determined must be either a dispute “sur ses droits et obligations de £ :@0.121066:0.692013:0.858733:0.692013:0.858733:0.676234:0.121066:0.676234:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.009437:0.007561:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041
caractere civil” or an “accusation en matiere penale”. The words “en matiere penale” indicate :@0.121066:0.708500:0.879556:0.708500:0.879556:0.692721:0.121066:0.692721:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010687:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.009437:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.009437:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.010196:0.005041
it is envisaged that there will be a penal element. The court seems to have had this point in :@0.121066:0.725011:0.854943:0.725011:0.854943:0.709232:0.121066:0.709232:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005041:0.012582:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.015728:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010687:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006291:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
mind when, in :@0.121066:0.741486:0.241967:0.741486:0.241967:0.725707:0.121066:0.725707:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
Engel v The Netherlands (No 1),:@0.242132:0.741486:0.512869:0.741486:0.512869:0.725707:0.242132:0.725707:0.013227:0.011332:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.012582:0.011332:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.005646:0.011332:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.011332:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.006916:0.014498:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041
 at p 678, para 82, it asked itself when it was :@0.513249:0.741486:0.876538:0.741486:0.876538:0.725707:0.513249:0.725707:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.006291:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.005041
setting out the first criterion “whether the provision(s) defining the offence charged belong, :@0.121066:0.757973:0.863489:0.757973:0.863489:0.742194:0.121066:0.742194:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.007561:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.006590:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.009457:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
according to the legal system of the respondent state, to criminal law, disciplinary law or both :@0.121066:0.774008:0.882002:0.774008:0.882002:0.758229:0.121066:0.758229:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.009437:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
concurrently.” In other words, proceedings ^ involving a charge which is merely disciplinary :@0.121066:0.790519:0.874643:0.790519:0.874643:0.774740:0.121066:0.774740:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.007561:0.005041:0.009457:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
in character will not fall within the ambit of article 6. :@0.121066:0.806994:0.554837:0.806994:0.554837:0.791215:0.121066:0.791215:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.014498:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.009406:0.015728:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.008812:0.006291:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.005323:0.005041
In :@0.121066:0.823481:0.143105:0.823481:0.143105:0.807702:0.121066:0.807702:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041
Oztiirk v Germany:@0.143120:0.823481:0.295618:0.823481:0.295618:0.807702:0.143120:0.807702:0.014498:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.014498:0.008812:0.007561:0.015728:0.010082:0.011332:0.008953
 (1984) 6 EHRR 409, 421, para 50 the court said that the first matter to :@0.295700:0.823481:0.872969:0.823481:0.872969:0.807702:0.295700:0.807702:0.005024:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.005041:0.012582:0.014498:0.013227:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.007541:0.005646:0.006916:0.007561:0.005646:0.005041:0.015728:0.008812:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
be ascertained was “whether or not the text defining the offence in issue belongs, according :@0.121066:0.839956:0.863270:0.839956:0.863270:0.824177:0.121066:0.824177:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.007561:0.008812:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.014498:0.009437:0.007561:0.005041:0.008812:0.014498:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.005646:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.006916:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.007561:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041
to the legal system of the respondent state, to criminal law”. In the continental systems the :@0.121066:0.856027:0.853713:0.856027:0.853713:0.840248:0.121066:0.840248:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.007561:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.006372:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.005646:0.008812:0.014498:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008166:0.010082:0.007561:0.005646:0.008812:0.015728:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
texts in question are likely to be found in a code, and there is often a separate criminal code :@0.121066:0.872502:0.862544:0.872502:0.862544:0.856723:0.121066:0.856723:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.006916:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.007561:0.005041:0.010082:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.005646:0.007561:0.008812:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005646:0.008812:0.005041:0.008812:0.007541:0.005646:0.015728:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005646:0.005041:0.008812:0.010082:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041
which can readily be identified. As the Lord President observed in :@0.121066:0.888989:0.659940:0.888989:0.659940:0.873210:0.121066:0.873210:0.014498:0.010082:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.006916:0.008812:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005646:0.006916:0.005646:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.014498:0.007561:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.005041:0.011977:0.010082:0.006916:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.006916:0.008812:0.007561:0.005646:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005646:0.005041:0.010082:0.010687:0.007561:0.008812:0.006916:0.010082:0.008812:0.010082:0.005041:0.005646:0.010082:0.005041
S v Miller:@0.660780:0.888989:0.742241:0.888989:0.742241:0.873210:0.660780:0.873210:0.011332:0.005041:0.008812:0.005041:0.017643:0.005646:0.005646:0.005646:0.008812:0.007844
 2001 SC 977, :@0.742107:0.888989:0.863048:0.888989:0.863048:0.873210:0.742107:0.873210:0.005041:0.010687:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.011332:0.013227:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041
988-989, para 21: :@0.121066:0.905470:0.269235:0.905470:0.269235:0.889691:0.121066:0.889691:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.006931:0.010082:0.010082:0.010082:0.005041:0.005041:0.010082:0.008812:0.006916:0.008812:0.005041:0.010082:0.010082:0.005799:0.005041