Page 1089 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

To: Josephine Ward; Wood, Peter
Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Austin, Andrew
Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015
at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
Good Afternoon,
➢ Please can I have your confirmation that the draft section 9 statement is acceptable asap?
➢ If I do not hear back by 11.30 tomorrow,
➢ I will have to assume it is and sign it off and send out as I will be in meetings and on holiday after that
time.
Thanks
Pete Wood

From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com>
Date: 9 February 2015 11:29:00 GMT
To: Josephine Ward Josie@michaelcarrollandco.com
Cc: Austin, Andrew Andrew.Austin@canopius.com
lorraine32@bluevonder.co.uk
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015
at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
Dear Ms Ward,
➢ I have drafted a section 9 statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it
satisfies all of your requirements please?
➢ As soon as you do so I will sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post.
➢ Let me know if you need anything else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way.
Lorraine/Andy - FYI.
Regards
672,
Peter Wood
UK Specialty Operations Manager |
UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group
KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ
D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com

From: Josephine Ward [mailto: Josie@michaelcarroHandco.com
Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02
To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew
Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
Dear Mr Wood
➢ I have been instructed by Mr Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th March 2015 at 10am.
➢ Miss Cordell has played two recordings that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal
but at present as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit by KGM they will not be
admissible at court.
Can you therefore please write a section 9 statement confirming that: