Page 115 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

➢ “that he was not rude to police, but he did feel like he could not even go out for the day with
some of his friends, without getting stopped and searched by members of the police. He states
he did not get upset in the manner that the police have said he did and that he does not mean to
come across as rude to police.
➢ In this case he was just trying to explain the error on the system.
➢ It is also noted that the caller was very clear that they saw a flat screen TV being put into Mr
Cordell’s van, which is confusing to why when the police searched the van, they found no TV,
but did in fact find two of his off-road motor bikes, which is not included in Steve Elsmore
statement.
➢ The police did checks on Mr Simon Cordell’s Off-Road Motor Bikes but this is also not stated,
but should show up on the seizure notice, as Mr Simon Cordell did ask the police office to take
careful note of the two off road motorbikes, as due to the high value of them.
5. Mr Simon Cordell will state;
➢ “that he did get a bit upset when the police said they were going to seize his van, as he did
have insurance in place to be able to drive the van in question, but there was an error on the
MID database.
➢ Miss Cordell had been trying to help her son resolve the issue concerning his insurance policy
not showing on the mid database alongside with members of their local police force and his
insurance company KGM too, together they had tried to work out why Mr Simon Cordell was
showing as uninsured.
➢ There was information noted as intelligence on the police National Computer stating this, I had
asked the police to check on their systems due to this, but they would not they just wanted to
seize Mr Simon Cordell’s van without checking, so he knew he was being wrongfully accused
at this point, as he had done nothing wrong and he did have insurance to be driving and had
paid a lot of money for his insurance.
➢ In addition, the prosecution offered no evidence in respect of the charges that were brought
even though they were reliant on police witnesses.
➢ Mr Simon Cordell had been wrongfully arrested for not having insurance when he was insured
to drive.
➢ He also did not cause any Anti-Social Behaviour on this date in question.
➢ There are no CADs for this date, but yet they were meant to be, a CAD referring to the pacific
details that should be relating to a person stating, that they believed a burglary was in progress
and of the 999-caller stating that they had seen a person who was putting a flat screen TV into
Mr Simon Cordell’s van.

In reference to the 07th April 2013, A friend’s Home
➢ Please read Mr Simon Cordell’s last statement dated the 24/02/2015 he states that he did not
attended any premises on this date to rave,

Insurance: 08/04/2013
Broadshaw" + "KGM the insurer" + "Lloyds Bank"
I was insured with under policy number MT3574694.
00.01 AM on the 23/02/13
and was in force until Midnight on the 22/02/14 when
it lapsed.

1
• The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 01
Insurance /