Page 1166 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

615. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_ (19) /
Page Numbers: 2300,2301,2302
Professional Standard Office – IPCC
Brixton Case / Met Police!
Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds
Bank / Canopius!

1
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
615. Jeanette. Reilly @met.pnn_ (19)
/ Page Numbers: 2300,2301,2302,
From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk
Sent: 15 December 2015 08:32
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: RE: complaint
Morning Lorraine,
➢ A full report covering all areas of complaint has been compiled.
➢ The Chief Inspector in Lambeth will review the full report and make a decision on what action or
sanction is most appropriate against the officer.
➢ Once his decision has been made, I will notify you and a further letter will be sent which includes details
regarding your right to appeal should you not agree with the outcome.
➢ I appreciate the concerns you have raised but will now need to wait for the Chief Inspectors final decision
before I can provide you with a full copy of the report that will explain why certain decisions were
reached.
Many thanks
Jeanette
Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) | Directorate of
Professional Standards
Met Phone 782253 | Telephone 020 7161 2253
Fax 020 7161 6798
Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk
Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR

From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 14 December 2015 12:59
To: Reilly Jeanette HQ
Directorate of Professional Standards
Subject: RE: complaint
Dear Jeanette
➢ Thank you for the reply to the complaint.
➢ As you have found one of the aspects of the complaint that PC Geoghegan lied to Simon Insurance is a
breach then does this mean that anything that happened after that fact was unlawful?
➢ As this caused a huge impact on Simon life after that lie happened, he was then arrested due to the lie,
had his van impounded to the lie, and then was found guilty at the lower court and then had to appeal to
prove he was innocent.
➢ His insurance company was going to close his insurance down and we had to prove to them there were no
tools in his van and in fact the police officer had lied.