Page 1306 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but
malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any
views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS).
Find us at:
Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk
Twitter: @metpolice.uk

9
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
809. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Our meeting today (2)
/ Page Numbers: 3371,3372,3373,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 31 July 2017 17:43
To: 'Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk'
Subject: RE: Our meeting today.
Dear Jamie Newman
➢ Thank you for the update email and I also hope you are well;
➢ can I ask a few things please now that you have had time to go over the documents and information.
➢ Regarding PC G notebook is my son's name at the top and has it been checked if a radio check was done on
my son on that day,
➢ I find it hard to believe that my son's name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to give his name
and that is why he was arrested, how would he have had my son's details to talk to the insurance companies
which there is no dispute that he did and he would have needed my son's details to be able to give them to
the insurance companies, which would mean he unlawfully arrested my son.
➢ I know you said you would have no problem giving us the notebook and his statement and other
information, does this mean we cannot get this information until after the investigation is completed?
➢ What will happen if PC G does not want to assist in this investigation, how long will you give him to reply
to your letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the investigation?
➢ I know this time we will have the right to appeal to the IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do believe there is
enough information and I cannot see why the CPS would not want to take this further, the only reason I can
see them not wanting to take this on is due to PC G is now Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social
Justice. How long do you think it will take you to complete the investigation?
Regards
Lorraine Cordell

From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
Sent: 31 July 2017 14:14
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Our meeting today.
Good Afternoon Lorraine,
➢ I hope this email finds you well.
➢ Further to our meeting last month I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate in the
reinvestigation,
➢ I await his reply.
➢ When and if he replies I shall of course let you know.
➢ Regarding a CPS referral, having reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a referral
should be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority (A.A. ‐ senior officer who reviews my
report) upon the conclusion of the investigation.
➢ As it stands, I see nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate.