Page 1319 - Driving Ban Simulation 1
P. 1319

➢  I find it hard to believe that my son's name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to give his name
          and that is why he was arrested, how would he have had my son's details to talk to the insurance companies
          which there is no dispute that he did and he would have needed my son's details to be able to give them to
          the insurance companies, which would mean he unlawfully arrested my son.
      3423,
      ➢  I know you said you would have no problem giving us the notebook and his statement and other
          information, does this mean we cannot get this information until after the investigation is completed?
      ➢  What will happen if PC G does not want to assist in this investigation, how long will you give him to reply
          to your letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the investigation?
      ➢  I know this time we will have the right to appeal to the IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do believe there is
          enough information and I cannot see why the CPS would not want to take this further, the only reason I can
          see them not wanting to take this on is due to PC G is now Head of Criminal Justice, Centre for Social
          Justice. How long do you think it will take you to complete the investigation?
      Regards
      Lorraine Cordell

      From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
      Sent: 31 July 2017 14:14
      To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
      Subject: Our meeting today.
      Good Afternoon Lorraine,
      ➢  I hope this email finds you well.
      ➢  Further to our meeting last month I have written to PC G to give him the opportunity to participate in the
          reinvestigation,
      ➢  I await his reply.
      ➢  When and if he replies I shall of course let you know.
      ➢  Regarding a CPS referral, having reviewed the evidence I am currently of the view that such a referral
          should be left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority (A.A. ‐ senior officer who reviews my
          report) upon the conclusion of the investigation.
      ➢  As it stands, I see nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think it appropriate.
      ➢  As you know, should the A.A. elect not to refer the matter to the CPS,
      ➢  you would of course have a right of appeal to the IPCC along those lines.
      ➢  If you have any questions for me please do let me know.
      Kind regards
      Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards |
      Met Phone 786675
      Telephone 0207 161 6675
      Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
      Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR
      'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’

      From: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards
      Sent: 30 June 2017 17:23
      To: 'Lorraine Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
      Subject: Our meeting today.
      Good Afternoon Lorraine,
      ➢  Thank you for taking the team to meet with this afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in enabling me to
          better understand your complaint.
      ➢  To confirm, the first thing I shall consider is a referral to the CPS.
      ➢  I shall begin by examining what
   1314   1315   1316   1317   1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324