Page 217 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
1. 6
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_11.22.2013_RE RE Simon Cordell _001
22/11/2013
/ Page Numbers: 33,34,35,36
37,38,39
--
33,
From: Lorraine Cordell
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent: 22 November 2013 14:24
To: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com
Subject: RE: RE: Simon Cordell
Attachments: Police-Meno.pdf.
Police complaint.doc.
CX52JRZ-Mid-database.png
Hello Martin
➢ After the call you made today and talked to myself Miss Lorraine Cordell, I am sending over the
information you asked for.
➢ I do feel also that KMG asking to speak to the police office is in breach of my data protection, but I will
be willing to write and allow them to do this.
➢ As I said to KMG yesterday on a phone that was made to them when I talked to Kelly Tilley, I have not
been found guilty at a court of law for not having no insurance and it is for a court of law to find me
guilty not a police officer who thinks I done something when I have not.
➢ Even if KGM does speak to the police office he will still say what he feels and that is not a fact that I am
guilty of anything.
➢ To be found guilty it would have to be done in front of a judge.
➢ Also, Martin as you said on the phone today when you in fact talked to the police on that day not once
did, they say I had anything in my van that would void my insurance, and in fact I believe at this stage if
the police did in fact have proof, they would have said to you that my van was full of things which is not
the case.
➢ I would like to also know if my insurance is going to carry on while this matter is addressed or if it will
be closed down on the 27/11/2013 as the letter says that KGM have sent me.
➢ And if KMG is going to close down my policy I would like full written conditions of what part of my
policy I have broken.
➢ As for the letter of complain that will be going to the police Simon still has not fully read over it to make
sure there is no errors or anything else that needs adding but it does go into details as to what went on, it
is only for use by yourself and KGM to read only.
➢ Also, as I said on the phone to you today the police are also telling me that the 3 times that my vehicles
were seized and I had to pay for them to be taken out of the compound, I will need to claim this back
from my insurance company as they had not done their job and put them on the database so they are at
fault not the police.
➢ You said to me today that KGM are looking into this as they are on the database, and it should show up
to the police that I am in fact insured.
➢ This has not been the case for me and I have suffered badly due to this and this is the reason I have to
carry my insurance policy at all times so when I get pulled over by the police, I can show them my
documents, as the police say it does not show up as I am insured, this is also the reason the insurance
company have had so many calls from the police to asked if I am insured or not since my policy started.