Page 638 - Driving Ban Simulation 1
P. 638

A
         B                   POLICE CONSTABLE RORY GAIRIGAN, Affirmed
                             Examined by MR POTTINGER …Cross…: 11
                             Examined by MR KENNEDY …Re…: 16
         C                   Examined by MR POTTINGER: 26
                             Submissions on behalf of the Appellant: 28
                             Submissions on behalf of the: 29
         D                   Respondent …Ruling…: 30
        1
        217,
         5th March 2015

         THE CLERK OF              Are you Simon Cordell?
         THE COURT:

         THE DEFENDANT:            Yes, that’s correct.

         THE CLERK:                Thanks. Take a seat.

         THE RECORDER:             Mr Pottinger, yes?
         MR POTTINGER:             My learned friend Mr Kennedy is for the appellant. Your Honour, the ~ this
                                   is a case of no insurance.
         THE RECORDER:             Mm.
         MR POTTINGER:             The defendant was stopped on Brixton Hill in a Ford Transit with a
                                   colleague. There are some disputes as to facts but according to the officer
                                   he appeared to be working at the time. There is in place a valid policy of
                                   insurance for that vehicle, the vehicle covering social, domestic, pleasure
                                   and motor trade purposes but not work.
         THE RECORDER:             Social, domestic...?
         MR POTTINGER:             Pleasure and motor trade purposes. I’ve been -1 was looking at Archbold
                                   with my learned friend just to see as far as what issues — who the burden is
                                   on. The prosecution has to prove that the defendant used a vehicle on a
                                   road. Once that is established, it’s for the defendant to prove there was a
                                   valid policy of insurance in force at the time. There’s no dispute the vehicle
                                   was being used on a road, there’s no dispute there was a valid policy of
                                   insurance in force at the time. The dispute here is the nature of the use at
                                   the time and in the place. I just want to check before we start on whom that
                                   burden falls.
         THE RECORDER:             Right.
         MR POTTINGER:             Archbold is silent on the point. I was just reconsidering matters. I don’t
                                   know if — I really think it should be established before we start just by
                                   looking at a court copy of Wilkinson although the difficulty being — or
                                   sometimes Blackstone is clearer than others. But I think it’s something that
                                   really needs to just be checked before we start because
         THE RECORDER:             I agree. Because if you can’t prove it
         MR POTTINGER:             Well, the Crown have — we have evidence that we say shows he was
                                   working at the time.
   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643