Page 842 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

From: m.mckee@michaelcarrollandco.com on behalf of Micheal McKee
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Read acknowledgement
Date: 09 February 2015 11:27:38
➢ This is a delivery receipt for the mail that you sent on 06 February 2015 to "Micheal McKee"
<m.mcke@michaelcarrollandco.com> with subject "Re: Police Complaint".
Note: This delivery receipt only acknowledges that the message was displayed on the recipient’s computer.
There is no guarantee that the recipient has read or understood the message contents.

5
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
453. Wood, Peter _Re_ Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v
/ Page Numbers: 1582,1583,
From: Wood, Peter [Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
Sent: 09 February 2015 11:30
To: Josephine Ward
Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk; Austin, Andrew
Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015
at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
Attachments: Witness Statement 060215 S Cordell.docx
Dear Ms Ward,
➢ I have drafted a section 9 statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it
satisfies all of your requirements please?
➢ As soon as you do so I will sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post.
➢ Let me know if you need anything else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way.
Lorraine/Andy – FYI.
Regards
Peter Wood
UK Specialty Operations Manager |
UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group
KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ
D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com

From: Josephine Ward [Mail To:josie@michaelcarrollandco.com]
Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02
To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew
Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
Dear Mr Wood
I have been instructed by Mr Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th March 2015 at 10am. Miss
Cordell has played two recordings that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal but at
present as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit by KGM they will not be
admissible at court. Can you therefore please write a section 9 statement confirming that:
(a) all recording equipment was working correctly
(b) KGM produced two recordings at the request of Ms Lorraine Cordell
(c) Confirmation that the recording of S Cordell call from police 141113 Recording was provided by