Page 1008 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

my son banned from driving and points and a fine, and within his statement which the judge noted had not
been dated and the fact there were no 101 books for the officer for this day.
➢ The ticket was also lost by the police that was issues on the day the police officer started this which was on
the 14/11/2014.
➢ The judge sitting at the court was not happy, and in fact stopped the hearing as he could clearly see what
the
➢ police officer had done.
➢ the judges went out and when they came back, they told my son he had won his case,
➢ the judge then spoke to the CPS about having the real statement and documents from the police officer that
day and that the audio files needed to stay on file.
➢ he also told the CPS he was not happy about the police officer and this had to be passed on to the right
person.
➢ Which the CPS said he would do.
➢ We are not happy about what this officer did and the cost it has caused my son and stress to his heath, my
sons insurance was going to close his insurance down for no reason only due to what the police office said,
days making calls to the police stations trying to prove my son did in fact have no tools in his van on that
day, him having to go to the compound where the van was taken to just so they could call his insurance
company to prove there were not tools that would have made my son's insurance void,
➢ all this due to the police actions on that day for no reason why did he need to lie, days going to court and
hearing a police officer lie in 2 courts.
➢ I will again be writing an update to the IPCC about what this officer has done.
➢ Could you please get back to me so this complaint can now be started I think the police officer should be
changed for what he has done.
➢ If anyone else lied in court not just once but 2 times they would end up in prison a police officer doing this
is one of the worse cases.
➢ And there was no reason for what he did the only reason I can think of is due to my son being mixed raced.
Regards
Lorraine Cordell

From: Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Vicki.McQueen@met.pnn.police.uk]
Sent: 11 December 2013 12:44
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Public complaint by your son Simon Cordell
Ms Cordell,
➢ I tried to call you today to ask you a question about your son's complaint.
➢ I was unable to get hold of you.
➢ Please can you reply and let me know if your son is disputing his penalty notice or not.
➢ If he has requested a Court hearing (which his complaint would tend to indicate) the complaint will be
classed as 'subjudice' Which means it will be put on hold until Court proceedings are complete.
Regards,
Victoria McQueen
Detective Sergeant
Customer Service Team
Metropolitan Police Service
Directorate of Professional Stan
1852
SW61TR
Tel; 02071616455 (786455)
Met Sec Code Restricted