Page 672 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

Date: 26 January 2015 23:10:04 GMT
To: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com>
Cc: complaints@lloyds.com <complaints@lloyds.com>
Subject: Re: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
Dear Peter Wood
➢ Thank you for picking this up and taking the time to deal with this matter.
➢ The date of the appeal I do not have yet.
➢ I are waiting for this, but the court and CPS said if I get the information needed before the court date then it
could be sent to the court who found me guilty and the CPS and this would be linked to the case and
addressed. In addition, there should be no need for the appeal court case.
➢ I am trying to do this so that a next day is not got to be wasted of my time in court and getting to and from
the court.
➢ The day that the police officer pulled me and told KGM that I had tools in my van, which the police officer
lied, and the police officer has said this in court so lied to the judge is 14/11/2013.
➢ I think due to what the police officer said in court the CPS and judge would like to know the facts and
➢ what the police officer said on that phone call to KGM.
➢ In addition, when KGM spoke to the manager at the police compound and found out in fact there was not
tools, I think the reason for this is the police officer committed perjury in the court.
➢ That is why they asked me to get proof that my insurance was not void, section 9 witness statements as to
what the police officer told KGM on the phone to try to void my insurance, in addition, the facts how
KGM found out I had in fact done nothing wrong and my insurance should not be cancelled.
➢ However, if you think a Letter of Indemnity would sort this matter out then if this could be done,
➢ I would be very grateful, but could you include in the letter only reason this has come about is due to what
the police officer told KGM about the tools being in the van.
➢ In addition, this is the reason KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them.
➢ This should cover it I hope as I really did nothing wrong, and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound, and they told her there was no tools.
➢ The vehicle registration I was driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included on
my insurance.
➢ So, should have shown on the database along with my car.
➢ However, none showed up as being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police.
➢ As already aware yes, I was stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the vehicle out of the compound for
the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up on the 16/11/2013.
➢ I have the ones for the 08/04/2013, 29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014
➢ I just need to get the receipts for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to no
insurance from the police compound.
➢ As for the Data Subject Access Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed.
➢ If I had known a fee was, needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to me
about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed.
Regards
Simon Cordell
1376,1377,1378,1379,1380,1381,1382,1383,1384,
1385,1386,1387,1388,1389,

5
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: