Page 678 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

➢ In addition, this is the reason KGM told the police officer that I would not then be covered by the insurance
policy I had in force with them.
➢ This should cover it I hope as I really did nothing wrong, and Kelly Tiller knows the police officer lied to
get my insurance cancelled as she spoke to the police compound, and they told her there was no tools.
➢ The vehicle registration I was driving on the 14/11/2010 was CX52JRZ, this registration was included on
my insurance.
➢ So, should have shown on the database along with my car.
➢ However, none showed up as being insured on the MID database, this is what has caused me all the
problems with the police.
➢ As already aware yes, I was stopped around 8 or 9 times and had vehicles seized. I do have some of the
some of them here already like do have the receipt what I paid to get the vehicle out of the compound for
the 14/11/2013 case I picked that up on the 16/11/2013.
➢ I have the ones for the 08/04/2013, 29/10/2013, 16/11/2013, 03/01/2014
➢ I just need to get the receipts for the other dates and also something that shows they was all sized due to no
insurance from the police compound.
➢ As for the Data Subject Access Request, I am most grateful that this is being addressed.
➢ If I had known a fee was, needed I would have paid that right away, but due to no one getting back to me
about the ones that were put in, I did not know a fee was needed.
Regards
Simon Cordell

From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
Sent: 23 January 2015 17:19
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: FW: FW: MT3574694
364,
Dear Mr Cordell,
➢ Unfortunately, Andy has been called away due to a family emergency, in his absence I have picked this
matter up.
➢ The first order of business to my mind is dealing with the Court case, can you confirm when the date has
been set for the hearing please?
➢ My thought is that we provide a Letter of Indemnity that basically confirms that you had a valid policy in
force between said dates and on what vehicles, this should satisfy the Courts but if they need anything else,
we will be happy to assist, just let me know what you require.
➢ I understand you were stopped several times and had vehicles seized, you are in the process of obtaining
evidence of these vehicle seizures and the costs incurred by you as a result for us to consider
compensation.
➢ When you have gathered this please forward the evidence to us as soon as possible.
➢ There is also the matter of your Data Subject Access Request.
➢ I have spent some time today tracking down recorded calls and various communications and hove notified
our Data Protection Officer of your request.
➢ I can see that you have made a request, any request should correctly be sent on for the attention of the Data
Protection Officer along with a £10 fee.
➢ Your request was addressed generally to KGM with no fee, and it would appear not actioned.
➢ The underwriter dealing with your request should have asked immediately for the fee payment and
escalated your request accordingly.
➢ This was not done for which I must apologise, as a result we will waive the fee requirement and I would
confirm this is now in hand.