Page 822 - Driving Ban Simulation 1
P. 822

➢  He also should remember all the phone calls.
        ➢  There is also a next issue Simon was not just covered with the basic trade insurance with KGM,
           Broadsure Direct had a special section with KGM which included in his insurance he was in fact covered
           for his work as a mechanic, not just standard insurance of trade buying and selling that KGM as a rule
           only deals with.
        ➢  This has been discussed with the underwriters at KGM by Broadsure Direct re Martin Jenkins.
        ➢  This also caused issues with his insurance cover a few times.
        ➢  This was also meant to have been address and seems it was not.
        ➢  At the time we were not happy as we were told he was not covered when in fact he was.
        ➢  If you call Broadsure Direct and speak to Martin Jenkins, I feel that he can send you the paperwork and
           under writing of how Simon’s insurance was meant to have been setup.
        ➢  As you can see there was a number of issues with his insurance with KGM that lead to problems.
        ➢  and even with the issues of 14/11/2013 when a call was made to Kelly Tiller, we asked did the police say
           what tools was meant to have been in the van as if there were mechanic tools in there his insurance should
           have in fact covered this.
        ➢  Kelly Tiller said no the police officer did not say which tools.
        ➢  But also said he was again not insured for this again Martin Jenkins got a rude call from us and again he
           had to make calls to address this issue.
        ➢  Can you please confirm he was correctly insured with KGM and write this as I would like this addressed?
        ➢  And one last thing could you please say in your letter on the date of the 14/11/2013 he was fully insured
           just so there cannot be any mistakes at court.
        ➢  Sorry, this is causing such an issue and taking up your time, but I really want to have something that is
           fully correct, as I do not want any other issues with courts, police and anything else that could cause my
           Son problems.
         Regards
         Lorraine.

         From: Wood, Peter [mailto:Peter.Wood@canopius.com]
         Sent: 30 January 2015 17:02
         To: Lorraine Cordell
         Cc: Austin, Andrew; Donovan, Paul
         Subject: RE: MT3574694 Simon Cordell
         Dear Simon,
         Please find attached the following -
        ➢  Recording of the original call made by the Police officer to KGM in which he advised that there were
           tools in your van.
        ➢  Recording of the call between Kelly Tiller and the Police compound in which Kelly was advised that
           there were no tools in the vehicle.
        ➢  Receipt showing purchase of the van.
         file:///C:/Users/Alienware/AppData/Local/Temp/2bf34c458f384c308de555fb3d6efba... 06/02/2015
         514+,
         Page 821 of21
        ➢  E-Mail from Gareth Mullet from the compound confirming that there was nothing on the seizure notice to
           indicate that there were any tools removed from the vehicle or in the vehicle in the compound.
        ➢  Letter of Indemnity for the CPS/Courts.
        ➢  I believe these are the relevant items you were after and hope this will assist you to resolve the court
           matters.
        ➢  If you need anything else please let me know, or in my absence Andy Austin.
   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827