Page 834 - Driving Ban Simulation 1
P. 834
Page Numbers: 1578
Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank
/ Canopius!
2
• The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
452. Lorraine Cordell _Fwd._ Appeal against
conviction for no insurance Regina v /
Page Numbers: 1579,1580
Broadsure Insurance / KGM Policy / Lloyds Bank
/ Canopius!
1
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
451. Josephine Ward Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v
/ Page Numbers: 1578,
From: Josephine Ward [josie@michaelcarrollandco.com]
Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02
To: Peter.Wood@canopius.com
andrew.austin@canopius.com
Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March
2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
Dear Mr Wood
➢ I have been instructed by Mr Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th March 2015 at 10am.
➢ Miss Cordell has played two recordings that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal
but at present as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit by KGM they will not be
admissible at court.
Can you therefore please write a section 9 statement confirming that:
A. all recording equipment was working correctly
B. KGM produced two recordings at the request of Ms Lorraine Cordell
C. Confirmation that the recording of S Cordell call from police 141113 Recording was provided by
KGM from their recorded calls and is authentic
D. Confirmation that the recording between the Car Pound and Kelly Tiller was also provided from the
KGM recorded calls and is authentic If we are in possession of a section 9 statement producing the
recordings then we will not have to apply to the court for a Third-Party Summons to compel an
employee from KGM to attend to produce the recordings.
E. This would be a complete waste of your time when all we require is a section 9 attesting to the
recordings being retrieved from the system and exhibited as two separate recordings.
F. If you require assistance with drafting a section 9 statement, then we would be happy to draft it and
email it over.
G. We would require the name of the person who retrieved the recordings the dates that the recordings
were retrieved, the dates the recordings relate to, confirmation that the recordings were sent to
Lorraine Cordell by email so that she can produce CDs of the recordings so that they can be played in
court and specifically refer to the email containing the recordings so that there is continuity in the
chain of evidence.

