Page 908 - Driving Ban Simulation 1
P. 908

➢  I will have to assume it is and sign it off and send out as I will be in meetings and on holiday after that
           time.
         Thanks
         Pete Wood
         551,

         From: Wood, Peter <Peter.Wood@canopius.com>
         Date: 9 February 2015 11:29:00 GMT
         To: Josephine Ward
         Josie@michaelcarrollandco.com
         Cc: Austin, Andrew
         Andrew.Austin@canopius.com
         lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
         lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
         Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015
         at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
         Dear Ms Ward,
        ➢  I have drafted a section 9 statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it
           satisfies all of your requirements please?
        ➢  As soon as you do so I will sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the original in the post.
        ➢  Let me know if you need anything else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way.
         Lorraine/Andy - FYI.
         Regards
         Peter Wood
         UK Specialty Operations Manager |
         UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group
         KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ
         D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com

         From: Josephine Ward [mailto:josie@michaelcarroHandco.com]
         Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02
         To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew
         Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
         Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at
         Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court
         Dear Mr Wood
        ➢  I have been instructed by Mr Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal against
           conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th March 2015 at 10am.
        ➢  Miss Cordell has played two recordings that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal
           but at present as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit by KGM they will not be
           admissible at court.
         Can you therefore please write a section 9 statement confirming that:
           A.  all recording equipment was working correctly
           B.  KGM produced two recordings at the request of Ms Lorraine Cordell
           C.  Confirmation that the recording of S Cordell call from police 141113 Recording was provided by
               KGM from their recorded calls and is authentic
           D.  Confirmation that the recording between the Car Pound and Kelly Tiller was also provided from the
               KGM recorded calls and is authentic If we are in possession of a section 9 statement producing the
   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913