Page 558 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

➢ I went the next day and asked to speak to the manager of the compound who in fact looked up my van and
said nothing was in there, there was not tools I called Kelly Tiller and the manager of the compound spoke
to her and confirmed there was nothing in the van when it was taken there by police and that I had put
thing in the van when I had taken it out of the compound.
➢ At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said the policy would not be cancelled.
➢ But on my way back from the compound driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it was
Broadsure direct saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset at this and told them what
had happened, I was asked to hold on they was called KGM back and would call me right back.
➢ I waited till Broadsure direct called me back and confirmed my insurance policy had not been cancelled
then drove home.
➢ From this point I have been asking for all information and putting data protection acts in which have not
been dealt with and I have heard nothing from KGM.
➢ I have been back and forward to court due to no insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so
was in fact found guilty as I did not know it was even going to court.
➢ I have had points put on my driving licence for no reason and had to go back and forward to court many
times when this should not have been the case.
➢ Then the case come up for the seizer when the police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my
documents but due to not having the information I had asked for from KGM many times about that case I
was found guilty.
➢ I am very upset about the whole policy with KGM.
➢ I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I have again asked for information and
again heard nothing.
➢ These matters need to be addressed as I am suffering due to all of this.
➢ Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows everything that has gone on as he was my main contact.
➢ I also have all the emails the last one that I will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st
Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the 26/11/2013.
➢ I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked
Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard nothing about more than once.
➢ Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I will ask the court to summons the people at KGM to deal with
this matter as they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied.
➢ All I have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this way I can send the section
9 witness statements over to the crown and the other information and this case should be dropped against
me.
➢ It just seemed that KGM does not want to do anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I
was insurance and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance.
➢ There is a lot more I could say about the insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy was my
worst nightmare.
➢ It has
292,
messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I could not drive so could not work.
➢ Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the information over that was needed to prove I did have
insurance.
➢ If you need o can send over all the emails that has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them
to KGM.
➢ I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be
taken out of the police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time.
➢ All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound, and all the times I have had
to go to court for no insurance when in fact I had insurance.
➢ And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not drive, this has all been costs to myself.
➢ My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue.