Page 797 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 06 February 2015 15:41
To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’
Cc: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk'; 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell
Dear Debbie Barnett CPS: and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court.
➢ I did send the below email with all attachments,
➢ but I don't think anyone got it due to its size.
➢ I am resending it in 3 parts.
Part 1 of 3 email
1574,
➢ Please see Attached files and please read below email.
➢ could you please also let me know you have got this email.
➢ I did also call yesterday and was told you was not in the office and spoke to someone who told me an
appeal date has been set for the 05/03/2015 the crown court.
➢ I have also spoke to Sheila today at the Crown court listing office where I told her that we had not had
any letters from the crown court she also told me that they did not get any emails I sent over.
➢ I do not have the case number and asked her if she could send the letter that was sent out by email to this
email address.
➢ Could all attached documents be attached to the case files please?
Regards
Lorraine Cordell

From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57
To: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’
Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: Re: Simon Cordell
Dear Debbie Barnett
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could you please also
confirm by email that you have this email. As explained, there have been a number of issues with my son
Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981.the issues are one of not being insured. When in fact he was. There was a
case heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon Cordell was found
guilty. Of using his vehicle for business purposes. This was only the case due to the police officer lying. Not
just to KGM who my son was insured with, but in his statement of facts, and also on oath to the judge and
CPS. The case is such that on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police
office told KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of tools in his van and was doing odd jobs. Under my
son insurance this would not have covered him, and the police officer would have known this already as my
son had given the police officer his policy at the side of the road. My son was arrested and taken to the
police station. Due to him refusing to sign the seizer notice and telling the police officer he was lying and to
arrest him. My sons Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with
no tools in there. The police office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call
but with something totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office at court about the tools
as he saw emails from KGM the police office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. The police
officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was already being put into the
police about complaints. So changed his story in his statement the facts are that there are audio tapes of what
the police officer said to KGM, and also the call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM
record all calls. I have both of the audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a