Page 800 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with no tools in there. The
police office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with something
totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office at court about the tools as he saw emails
from KGM the police office told the judge he knew nothing about any tools. The police officer I believed
new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was already being put into the police about
complaints. So changed his story in his statement. The facts are that there are audio tapes of what the police
officer said to KGM, and also the call that was made to Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all
calls. I have both of the audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a manager
sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. How can a police officer act in such a manner? I really do not understand why
he did this. As also said on the phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other
stops from police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and he been found guilty when he
did not even know there was a case in court. I have sent many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his
insurance documents to the court. 2 case we had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for
Bromley. The Willesden one seems to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty, but they put this case under a new case number looking at the letter so all the
documents that were sent before was not with the court file I would have through. But with both statutory
declarations we added a copy of his insurance. I have been trying for some time to get all of this put together
so it can all be addresses and so far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. We
also asked at court when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Could you
please tell us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases addressed without the need to be
going from one court to the next. This is a waste of courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to
be is check my son’s insurance that he was in fact insured. I am sure that the letter that has been sent of
Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he was in fact insured. Could you please
advise what needs to be done with these other cases? Please can you address the issues in this email and get
back to me by email.
Regards
Lorraine Cordell

59.
Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
1. 59
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk_02.06.2015_RE Re Simon Cordell_001
06/02/2015
/ Page Numbers: 493,494,495,496,497,498
499,500,501,502
--
493,
From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
Sent: 06 February 2015 16:27
To: listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk
swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell
Attachments: Appeal-Case-Driving-Tools-26-11-2014.pdf
S Cordell 020215.pdf
MT Underwriting-FW-MR-SIMON-CORDELL - CX52 JRZ.pdf
Dear Debbie Barnett CPS: and Sheila from the Listing Office at the crown court.
➢ It does seem I am having trouble with sending the audio files could you please tell me how I can send
them I have put the other files in but not the audio which will need to be put with his case files.