Page 798 - Driving Ban Simulation 1
P. 798
manager sent to Kelly Tiller at KGM. How can a police officer act in such a manner? I really do not
understand why he did this.
1575,
As also said on the phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other stops from
police, these cases he has gone to court without him knowing and he been found guilty when he did not
even know there was a case in court. I have sent many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his
insurance documents to the court. 2 case we had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for
Bromley. The Willesden one seems to have been reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing
again he was found guilty, but they put this case under a new case number looking at the letter so all the
documents that were sent before was not with the court file I would have through. But with both statutory
declarations we added a copy of his insurance. I have been trying for some time to get all of this put together
so it can all be addresses and so far, nothing has been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. We
also asked at court when we went to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, but nothing was done. Could you
please tell us where we can sort this out about getting all the other cases addressed without the need to be
going from one court to the next. This is a waste of courts time and money when clearly all that is needed to
be is check my son’s insurance that he was in fact insured. I am sure that the letter that has been sent of
Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he was in fact insured. Could you please
advise what needs to be done with these other cases?
Please can you address the issues in this email and get back to me by email.
Regards
Lorraine Cordell
This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet antivirus service supplied by Vodafone in
partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call
your organisations IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email. Internet email is not a
secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that
in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by email. This email (whether
you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice.
Email monitoring / blocking software may be used, and email content may be read at any time. You have a
responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding emails and their contents. The
original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service
supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email
has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal
purposes.
21
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
450. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (1)
/ Page Numbers: 1576,1577,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 06 February 2015 16:27
To: 'listing@kingstonuponthames.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk'
Cc: ‘London.MagistratesSouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk’; 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: RE: Re: Simon Cordell
Attachments: AppealCaseDrivingTools26112014.
pdf; S Cordell 020215.pdf; MT

