Page 725 - Driving Ban Simulation 1
P. 725

I look forward to hearing from you with this information.
         Regards,
         Andrew Austin
         Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance
         Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18
         1RZ
         D +44 (0) 20 8530 1806 | M 07469 147743 | <http://www.kgminsurance.co.uk/> www.kgminsurance.co.uk |
         <http://www.canopius.com/> www.canopius.com

         From: Lorraine Cordell mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
         Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22
         To: Austin, Andrew
         Cc: complaints@,llovds.com
         Subject: RE: MT3574694
         Dear Andrew
         I will forward this to you within a few days I will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all the
         tickets as I believe there is a few missing.
         I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters
         from DVLA, which I will forward over to
         444,
         you once I have scanned then in so please give me a few days and I will get back to you with this
         information as there is a lot of data.
         The main one at this time I am worried about is the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police lying
         and me being found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about what was needed,
         and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and about the appeal.
         This data should have been given under the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I put
         in, so was wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subject access request under
         the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in so to do a 4th I do not feel I should need to do.
         KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act
         1998 which has been put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information
         Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the information, I have asked for
         under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no insurance.
         And now say to deal with this you need information from me. I can understand you want the information for
         the complaint that has been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for
         an appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the
         Data Protection Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty.
         I would like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and
         see if fact I was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted
         going to court.
         Regards
         Simon Cordell
         445,

         From: Austin, Andrew [mailto: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com
         Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54
         To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
         Subject: RE: MT3574694
         Dear Mr Cordell
   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730