Page 660 - Driving Ban Simulation 1
P. 660

vehicle — used a vehicle on the road. Once that is established it’s for the
                                    defendant to prove there was a valid policy in force at the time. But the
                                    slight grey area here is the — it’s the nature of the use that’s being
                                    contested.
         THE RECORDER:              Yes. Thank you. Anything else?
         MR POTTINGER:              No.
         THE RECORDER:              Thank you. Although it’s after one o’clock, we’re going to rise and we’re
                                    going to come back within the next five or ten minutes and deal with this
                                    submission. I apologise to all those whose luncheon it will interfere with,
                                    but it may take less time in the end. Thank you very much.
         (There followed a short adjournment)

         THE RECORDER:              We’ve considered this case very carefully and we’re very unhappy with it.
                                    In essence, we are going to take a robust approach and we are going to
                                    dismiss this case now thereby allowing the appeal. I don’t propose to give
                                    any further grounds or reasons. We are not satisfied that the Crown have
                                    shown sufficient cause that this man wasn’t covered by this policy, if
                                    you’ll forgive the double negatives, and in the circumstances, we allow the
                                    appeal.
         MR KENNEDY:                I’m very grateful. Costs follow the event.
         THE RECORDER:              Yes, they do.
         MR KENNEDY:                (Inaudible) for costs.
        30
        246,
         THE RECORDER:              Application for costs granted.
         MR KENNEDY:                Thank you.
         THE RECORDER:              I would like to see the officer’s notebooks, please, Mr Pottinger, and I’d
                                    like them handed to the clerk, the original ones, so that I can view them
                                    and they will be returned in due course.
         MR POTTINGER:              What — what he gave me was — was in fact the same statement you have.
         THE RECORDER:              Right. He said - he referred to some — there was - as though there was a
                                    date-stamp on the back of something.
         MR POTTINGER:              There’s a — that’s the
         THE RECORDER:              Can I see that now? That’ll be fine.
         MR POTTINGER:              Yes, certainly.
         THE RECORDER:              Thank you very much.
         MR POTTINGER:              I just mention matters outside — I think there was a -- the fixed penalty
                                    notice, the original fixed penalty notice, isn’t in the file and I’m afraid that
                                    is what happens these days. In the old d
         THE RECORDER:              Yes.
         MR POTTINGER:              the original file would come through on appeal. The way the system works
                                    now, you do
         THE RECORDER:              No, no. I — I understand. I understand.
         MR POTTINGER:              And I can only
         THE RECORDER:              No, no. It’s not your fault at all.
         MR POTTINGER:              It may be on the back of that, the original handwritten
   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665