Page 564 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

gone on as he was my main contact. I also have all the emails the last one that I will enclose again, which I
have heard nothing about and the 1st Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on
the 26/11/2013. I did in fact send the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 about time
times and asked Martin Jenkins to look into why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get the
appeal date for crown court, I will ask the court to summon the people at KGM to deal with this matter as
they know I was insurance and did nothing wrong and the police lied. All I have asked for is the data so there
will be no need to summons people this way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown
and the other information and this case should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want
to do anything and give me the information I need to prove in fact I was insurance and the police lied to
KGM to in fact make it that I was not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the insurance I had
with KGM, but this insurance policy was my worst nightmare. It has messed my clean driving licence up and
in fact got to the point I could not drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the
information over that was needed to prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails
that has been sent back and forward to Broadsure who sent them to KGM.
1257,
I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this insurance policy I have had to pay for my vehicles to be taken
out of the police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to £200.00 a time. All the loss of work
due to having to take time to go to the police compound, and all the times I have had to go to court for no
insurance when in fact I had insurance. And points put on my driving licence to the fact I could not drive, this
has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also written many of the emails and is fine with
dealing with this issue.
Regards
Simon Cordell

3
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
416. Austin, Andrew _RE_ MT3574694
/ Page Numbers: 1258,1259,1260,1261,
From: Austin, Andrew [Andrew.Austin@canopius.com]
Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54
To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
Subject: RE: MT3574694
Dear Mr Cordell
Thank you for your email.
My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following documentary evidence from you with regards to any losses
that may have been incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous letter, I require the
following:
1. Confirmation of the points you raised to the Financial Ombudsman when you verbally submitted your
complaint and the outcome you are looking to achieve.
2. Full details of the losses that you have incurred as a direct result of your complaint and full
documentary evidence supporting this.
3. Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs imposed directly as a result of your complaint,
including full documentary evidence supporting this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy to
consider this further. With regards to your subject access request. My letter of the 9/12/14 advised the
following:
Following our initial investigations, we note that you submitted a subject access request to your Broker.
Should you wish to proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to our Data Protection
Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter including a cheque payable to KGM Insurance for the
sum of £10.00. Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations have been finalised. Can you