Page 566 - Driving Ban Simulation 1
P. 566

there was nothing in the van when it was taken there by police and that I had put thing in the van when I had
        taken it out of the compound. At this point Kelly tiller believed me and said the policy would not be
        cancelled. But on my way back from the compound driving my phone ring and I stopped to pick it up and it
        was Broadsure direct saying my policy had in fact been cancelled I was very upset at this and told them what
        had happened, I was asked to hold on they was called KGM back and would call me right back. I waited till
        Broadsure direct called me back and confirmed my insurance policy had not been cancelled then
        1260,
        drove home. From this point I have been asking for all information and putting data protection acts in which
        have not been dealt with and I have heard nothing from KGM. I have been back and forward to court due to
        no insurance and in fact 4 cases I did not get any summons so was in fact found guilty as I did not know it
        was even going to court. I have had points put on my driving licence for no reason and had to go back and
        forward to court many times when this should not have been the case. Then the case come up for the seizer
        when the police said I had tools in my van I went to court with all my documents but due to not having the
        information I had asked for from KGM many times about that case I was found guilty. I am very upset about
        the whole policy with KGM. I have put an appeal in, and this case will be going to crown court I have again
        asked for information and again heard nothing. These matters need to be addressed as I am suffering due to
        all of this. Martin Jenkins at Broadsure Direct knows everything that has gone on as he was my main contact.
        I also have all the emails the last one that I will enclose again, which I have heard nothing about and the 1st
        Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 that I sent on the 26/11/2013. I did in fact send the
        Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 about time times and asked Martin Jenkins to look
        into why I had heard nothing about more than once. Once I get the appeal date for crown court, I will ask the
        court to summon the people at KGM to deal with this matter as they know I was insurance and did nothing
        wrong and the police lied. All I have asked for is the data so there will be no need to summons people this
        way I can send the section 9 witness statements over to the crown and the other information and this case
        should be dropped against me. It just seemed that KGM does not want to do anything and give me the
        information I need to prove in fact I was insurance and the police lied to KGM to in fact make it that I was
        not insurance. There is a lot more I could say about the insurance I had with KGM, but this insurance policy
        was my worst nightmare. It has messed my clean driving licence up and in fact got to the point I could not
        drive so could not work. Due to the fact, KGM could not send me the information over that was needed to
        prove I did have insurance. If you need o can send over all the emails that has been sent back and forward to
        Broadsure who sent them to KGM. I have lost a lot of money, and time due to this insurance policy I have
        had to pay for my vehicles to be taken out of the police compound around 8 to 9 times at a cost of £180.00 to
        £200.00 a time. All the loss of work due to having to take time to go to the police compound, and all the
        times I have had to go to court for no insurance when in fact I had insurance. And points put on my driving
        licence to the fact I could not drive, this has all been costs to myself. My Mother Lorraine Cordell has also
        written many of the emails and is fine with dealing with this issue.
        Regards
        1261,
        Simon Cordell
        Confidentiality Caution
        The information in this email
        and in any attachments is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message
        and notify the sender immediately. Canopius may monitor the content of emails sent and received via its
        network for viruses, unauthorised use or other lawful business purposes. Email sent for and on behalf of a
        member of Canopius Group, which includes:
        Canopius Holdings UK Limited | registered number 04818520
        Canopius Managing Agents Limited | registered number 01514453 | Authorised by the Prudential
        Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation
   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571