Page 567 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

Authority Canopius Underwriting Limited | registered number 02473672 | appointed representative of
Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Canopius Services Limited | registered number 02733994
KGM Motor Insurance is a brand name for business written by Canopius Managing Agents Limited
Registered office: Gallery 9, One Lime Street, London, EC3M 7HA | Registered in England and
Wales

4
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
417. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ MT3574694_ (1)
/ Page Numbers: 1262,1263,1264,1265,1266,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 21 January 2015 13:22
To: 'Austin, Andrew'
Cc: 'complaints@lloyds.com'
Subject: RE: MT3574694
Dear Andrew
➢ I will forward this to you within a few days I will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all
the tickets as I believe there is a few missing.
➢ I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters
from DVLA, which I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in so please give me a few days
and I will get back to you with this information as there is a lot of data.
➢ The main one at this time I am worried about is the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police
lying and me being found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about what was
needed, and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and about the appeal.
➢ This data should have been given under the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I
put in, so was wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subj etc.
➢ access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in so to do a 4th I do not feel I
should need to do.
➢ KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act
1998 which has been put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information
Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the information,
➢ I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no insurance.
➢ And now say to deal with this you need information from me.
➢ I can understand you want the information for the complaint that has been put in, but not the information I
asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing.
➢ And in fact, would not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998
as I would not have been found guilty.
➢ I would like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and
see if fact I was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted
going to court.
Regards
Simon Cordell

From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com]
Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54
To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
Subject: RE: MT3574694