Page 571 - Driving Ban Simulation 1

Dear Andrew
➢ I will forward this to you within a few days I will ask the police compound to do a full print out as to all
the tickets as I believe there is a few missing.
➢ I do have around 6 of the tickets here when the vehicles were sized, I also do have court letters, and letters
from DVLA, which I will forward over to you once I have scanned then in so please give me a few days
and I will get back to you with this information as there is a lot of data.
➢ The main one at this time I am worried about is the case where the vehicle was sized due to the police
lying and me being found guilty at court you did have an email on the 30 November 2014 about what was
needed, and I do have the court letter showing I was found guilty and about the appeal.
➢ This data should have been given under the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 I
put in, so was wondering what you can do about this and if you will need a new Subj etc.
➢ access request under the Data Protection Act 1998, I have already sent 3 in so to do a 4th I do not feel I
should need to do.
➢ KGM have in fact did not follow the protocol for the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act
1998 which has been put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information
Commissioner’s Office as I do not see any reason you would have to stop the information,
➢ I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no insurance.
➢ And now say to deal with this you need information from me.
➢ I can understand you want the information for the complaint that has been put in, but not the information I
asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for an appeal that is ongoing.
➢ And in fact, would not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998
as I would not have been found guilty.
➢ I would like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regard to this so they can look at the facts and
see if fact I was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted
going to court.
Regards
Simon Cordell

From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com]
Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54
To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
Subject: RE: MT3574694
Dear Mr Cordell
Thank you for your email.
1268,
My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following documentary evidence from you with regards to any losses
that may have been incurred as a result of the above, I confirm as detailed in my previous letter, I require the
following:
1. Confirmation of the points you raised to the Financial Ombudsman when you verbally submitted your
complaint and the outcome you are looking to achieve.
2. Full details of the losses that you have incurred as a direct result of your complaint and full
documentary evidence supporting this.
3. Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs imposed directly as a result of your complaint,
including full documentary evidence supporting this. Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy to
consider this further. With regards to your subject access request. My letter of the 9/12/14 advised the
following: Following our initial investigations we note that you submitted a subject access request to
your Broker. Should you wish to proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to
our Data Protection Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter including a cheque payable to
KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00. Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full investigations